Let’s test your knowledge of Type 2 General Questions

In these later years‚ Twain’s writings were dark. They began to focus on human greed and cruelty and questioned the humanity of the human race. His public speeches followed suit and included a harshly sarcastic public introduction of Winston Churchill in 1900. Even though Twain’s lecture tour had managed to get him out of debt‚ his anti-government writings and speeches threatened his livelihood once again. As Twain was labelled by some as a traitor‚ several of his works were never published during his lifetime, either because magazines would not accept them or because of his own personal fear that his marketable reputation would be ruined.

In 1903‚ after living in New York City for three years‚ Livy became ill, and Twain and his wife returned to Italy, where she died a year later. After her death‚ Twain lived in New York until 1908, when he moved into his last house‚ “Stormfield,” in Redding‚ Connecticut. Later, Jean‚ the youngest daughter‚ died from an epileptic seizure. Four months later, on April 21‚ 1910‚ Mark Twain died at age 74.

Like any good journalist‚ Mark Twain spent his life observing and reporting on his surroundings. In his writings he provided images of the romantic‚ the real‚ the strengths and weaknesses of a rapidly changing world. By examining his life and his works‚ we can read into the past – piecing together various events of the era and the responses to them. We can delve into the American mindset of the late nineteenth century and make our own observations of history‚ discover new connections‚ create new inferences and gain better insights into the time period and the people who lived in it. As Twain once wrote‚ “Supposing is good‚ but finding out is better.”

1. Which of the following statements is true of Mark Twain, according to the text?
  • 0
    0

    Explanation

    The correct answer is D.

    Here, the best keywords can be found in statement C but there are not many very good ones. Therefore, it may be a good idea to start by reading the first couple and last couple of sentences to get a better footing in the text, before searching for synonyms and the best
    keywords you can find. Furthermore, although the question is decidedly type 2 because the article is about Mark Twain so the stem is deceptively general, search for any quotes from the person in the stem to see if you can decide anything from them. Here, the final quote of the passage sheds some light on a couple of the statements.

    Statement A is proven false by the final quote – ‘supposing is good, but finding out is better’. Therefore, we can see that Twain preferred to observe and find out than to philosophise.

    Statement B is not mentioned in the text – by reading the first couple of sentences we see that the passage is focused on his later life. His early life may be mentioned, but under time pressure it is safe to skip this statement and come back if needed.

    Statement C is an extreme statement so could be ignored if you are short on time. However, using the key phrase ‘changing world’ we find that in his writings he explored ‘the strengths and weaknesses of a rapidly changing world’ – so clearly he saw the weaknesses too.

    Statement D can also be assessed based on the final quote – a direct quote of Twain saying that to find out is ‘better’ – therefore this statement is true.

    Post Comment

    Submarine warfare has been around a while. Primitive subs were used with mixed results from the Revolutionary War up until World War I, when advances were made in propulsion and torpedoes. However, it was the Germans who most effectively used their submarines, called U- boats, against allied shipping during World War I. The allies took note and began to modernize their submarines. By the time the United States became involved in World War II, the advances were pivotal to the success of the country’s sea power.

    “Compared with their World War I counterparts, submarines [in World War II] now exhibited greater speed, more effective weaponry, sophisticated detection technology and great versatility, and could pursue their victims rather than just lying in wait, “wrote historian Gary E. Weir.

    Submarine warfare took place in both the Pacific and European theatres of war. However, U.S. Navy submarines saw their greatest success against Japanese merchant vessels and warships. Submarines also played humanitarian and special operations roles in the campaign against Japan. In many of the hardest-fought battles of the war, submarine crews rescued downed carrier pilots, including future President George H.W. Bush. 

    Out of 16,000 U.S. submariners, the force lost 375 officers and 3,131 enlisted men in 52 submarines, and “although this was a tragic loss, it was still the lowest casualty rate of any combatant submarine service on either side in the 1939-1945 conflict,” Weir noted. In the final months of the war, American submarines had difficulty finding targets because the Japanese had virtually no ships left to sink.

    2. Which of the following statements is true, according to the text?
  • 0
    0

    Explanation

    The correct answer is C.

    Here, statement A is an extreme statement, whereas statements B and D have the best keywords. So, you might choose to assess this question in the order B, D, C.

    Statement A is extreme but does have the good keywords Pacific and European. It can be quickly assessed that submarines were used in the Pacific and European theatres of war, but no mention of others is made. Regardless of previous knowledge, the text does not say that these were the only theatres of war therefore this statement is untrue.

    Statement B has the key phrase ‘casualty rate’, found in the final paragraph where it is explained that the submarine corps had the lowest casualty rate of all other submarine services, but the two forces mentioned in the statement are not discussed so this cannot be discerned.

    Statement C is a direct match with the final sentence of the text, with the key phrase ‘end of the war’ to direct you here. If American submarines could not find targets, it is reasonable to assume they were less useful.

    Statement D has the keyword Japan – the text says submarines were also important in humanitarian and special operations in the third paragraph. It does not mention the split of how submarines were used, so we cannot deduce they were mostly confined to the military.

    Post Comment

    Thousands of people have searched for a chest full of gold and gemstones hidden in the Rocky Mountains hidden by a reclusive millionaire adventurer. At least four people died in their quest for the treasure. But now,” Fenn’s Treasure” has been found. The 89-year-old adventurer named Forrest Fenn, who created the treasure hunt, announced the news on Sunday, June 7, 2020. “I do not know the person who found it, but the poem in my book led him to the precise spot,” Fenn wrote. He told the Santa Fe New Mexican the treasure was confirmed by a photograph the lucky finder sent him.

    The treasure hunt was a modified version of an earlier idea. Fenn was diagnosed with terminal cancer in 1988 and had planned to die peacefully in the woods with his treasure. But when his cancer went into remission, he put his plans on hiatus, eventually writing the poem that described his ideal resting place, where he hid the treasure. The poem appeared in a self- published memoir. He told Business Insider that the chest wouldn’t be found by accident.

    Several treasure hunters went missing while attempting to find the chest, including hunter Jeff Murphy of Batavia, Illinois, who disappeared from Yellowstone National Park in the summer of 2017. Murphy had been hunting for the treasure for a few years and had been in contact with Fenn. He was reported missing when he didn’t check in with his wife, and his remains were found the same month on June 9, 2017. The death was ruled accidental — Murphy is believed to have lost his footing in the mountains, resulting in a 500-foot fall.

    3. Which of the following statements is true, according to the text?
  • 0
    0

    Explanation

    The correct answer is D.

    As a type 2 statement question, you need to decide which statements to start with. Here, A and C have names which make very good keywords so you may want to start here when scanning.

    Statement A has the keyword Fenn, but he is discussed rather a lot in the passage so it may be better to use the slightly less identifiable but good keyword ‘terminal cancer’, which is found in the second paragraph. Although Fenn was diagnosed with it in 1988, there is a quote from him in the text about the discovery of the treasure so he cannot have died.

    Statement B does not require a keyword but you should have seen it on reading the first couple of sentences which describe the chest as full of ‘gold and gemstones’. The chest contains gold, but not bearer bonds therefore this is not the correct answer.

    Statement C has the name ‘Murphy’, which is a good keyword. The text explains that he went missing in summer 2017 but was found in June 2017, ‘the same month’, therefore he cannot have been missing for a long time before being found.

    Statement D has the key phrase ‘4 people’, and the text says that ‘at least’ 4 people died which heavily implies that more may have died. This is therefore the correct answer.

    Post Comment

    Research shows that nearly 70% of cancer patients and a staggering 90% of patients enrolled in an early phase clinical trial use alternative therapies. We now know that many of these therapies are unhelpful and some downright dangerous. Herbs and supplements can interact with chemotherapy and reduce its efficacy, a real drawback when therapy is given with curative intent. Genetic fingerprinting reveals that many popular supplements are filled with powdered rice and weeds. The World Health Organisation calls this a threat to consumer safety.

    Electron therapy, radio waves, magnetic energy and light boxes as a cure for cancer have been consistently refuted by influential cancer organisations, including the American Cancer Society and Cancer Council Australia. Gerson therapy is promoted as “the natural treatment that activates the body’s extraordinary ability to heal itself”. The Cancer Research UK website explains that it requires an individual to consume nine (yes, nine) kilos of fruit and vegetables and use three or four coffee enemas every day. There is a discreet mention that “in certain situations Gerson therapy could be very harmful to health”.

    In 10 years of being an oncologist I have witnessed some devastating consequences when practitioners recommend “alternative” therapies. The emaciated breast cancer patient who died of spinal cord compression after vigorous manipulation of her back. The man whose finances and prostate cancer had both spiralled out of control by the time he forked out $50,000 dollars on vitamin infusions. He regretted forgoing the proven benefit of chemotherapy. There was the man whose wife discovered the extent of his natural therapy
    debt only after he died and was forced to sell the house. There were the children who quit studying to help pay for their father’s imported exotic herbs sourced from the wild. These stories are not unique – every oncologist tells a tale of financial and psychological ruin, experienced by the family long after the patient dies.

    4. Which of the following statements is true, according to the text?
  • 0
    0

    Explanation

    The correct answer is B.

    Here, statement D actually has the best keyword, which is Gerson therapy, a name. Therefore,
    you could start here and work backwards through the statements.

    Statement A has the key phrase ‘manipulation’, found in the third paragraph which describes negative effects of manipulation on a cancer patient. However, no mention is made of the efficacy for back pain.

    Statement B has the keyword ‘herbs’ which is found in the first paragraph where it says herbs may negatively affect cancer treatment. Therefore, this is the correct answer.

    Statement C’s keyword is ‘light boxes’ which is cited as something which has been repeatedly refuted by evidence, therefore it is unlikely to be a useful treatment for cancer.

    Statement D has the keyword ‘Gerson’, however the text says that it calls for 9kg of fruit and vegetables a day. Although tenuously one might describe this as healthy, it cannot be described as practical.

    Post Comment

    In 2001, nearly two decades into Dr Pereira’s accidental specialisation in addiction, Portugal became the first country to decriminalise the possession and consumption of all illicit substances. Rather than being arrested, those caught with a personal supply might be given a warning, a small fine, or told to appear before a local commission – a doctor, a lawyer and a social worker – about treatment, harm reduction, and the support services that were available to them.

    The opioid crisis soon stabilised, and the ensuing years saw dramatic drops in problematic drug use, HIV and hepatitis infection rates, overdose deaths, drug-related crime and incarceration rates. HIV infection plummeted from an all-time high in 2000 of 104.2 new cases per million to 4.2 new cases per million in 2015. The data behind these changes has been studied and cited as evidence by harm-reduction movements around the globe. It’s misleading, however, to credit these positive results entirely to a change in law.

    Portugal’s remarkable recovery, and the fact that it has held steady through several changes in government – including conservative leaders who would have preferred to return to the US- style war on drugs – could not have happened without an enormous cultural shift, and a change in how the country viewed drugs, addiction – and itself. In many ways, the law was merely a reflection of transformations that were already happening in clinics, in pharmacies and around kitchen tables across the country. Most importantly, an official policy of decriminalisation made it far easier for a broad range of services (health, psychiatry, employment, housing etc) that had been struggling to pool their resources and expertise, to work together more effectively to serve their communities.

    5. Which of the following statements is true, according to the text?
  • 1
    0

    Explanation

    The correct answer is A.

    In this question, statement B has the best keywords because it contains numerical data. Therefore, you may want to start by assessing this statement before continuing.

    Statement A has the keyword ‘locally’, as this is the main focus of the statement. In the first paragraph, it is explained that drug-related incidents are dealt with by a ‘local commission’, suggesting that such issues are dealt with locally.

    Statement B has key numbers, which are found in the second paragraph. On careful reading, the text says that there were 100 fewer new cases per million people in 2015 than 2005, not 100 million fewer cases on the whole. Therefore, this is not the correct answer.

    Statement C has the keyword ‘prescription drugs’ and the date ‘2001’. 2001 is found at the very beginning as the date of decriminalisation. In the second paragraph it is detailed that after decriminalisation ‘the opioid crisis stabilised’, implying that there was a prescription drug problem in the first place.

    Statement D has the keyword ‘conservative’, found in the final paragraph. However, in this region it is explained that the improvements held steady through several governments, including conservative ones. Therefore, this statement is not true.

    Common trap!
    Numerical data in questions should be treated with suspicion, because it’s very easy to make passage adjustments to. For instance, an increase from 20 to 30 looks like a one-third increase however it is a 50% increase. In this instance, 100 fewer new cases per million may look like 100 million fewer cases but this is not true.

    Post Comment

    Matt Hancock, the health secretary, and NHS bosses are pushing for a £5bn-a-year deal to treat NHS patients in private hospitals and tackle a spiralling backlog amid the coronavirus pandemic, the Guardian has learned. But the Treasury is blocking the plan, which could cover a broad range of treatments including cancer surgery, joint operations and cataract removals amid concerns that it will not offer value for money.

    The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) and NHS England want the Treasury to fund an extension of a contract that has resulted in scores of private hospitals being paid about £400m a month to perform procedures since the start of the pandemic, when the NHS suspended swathes of non-urgent treatment to prioritise Covid-19 patients. The deal, agreed in March, in effect gave the NHS control of the private sector’s 8,000 beds, 680 operating theatres and 20,000 staff, though there were concerns that many hospitals stood near-empty during the Covid-19 crisis. It has never confirmed how much the scheme costs.

    Health bosses believe extra capacity is vital if the NHS is to avoid the number of people waiting for treatment in England hitting 10 million by the end of the year, as predicted by the NHS Confederation last week. NHS chiefs told the Guardian this projection was a realistic outcome, especially as the need for physical distancing means hospital bosses project they will be able to operate at only 60-70% of normal capacity.

    Reservations at the Treasury are so strong, however, that it has refused to sign off the deal, which the DHSC and NHS England’s chief executive, Simon Stevens, had already agreed with representatives of big private hospital groups such as Spire Healthcare, Ramsay Health Care and HCA International. At the start of the month the Treasury stepped in at the 11th hour to stop the DHSC from announcing the deal and has told NHS England to get more detailed commitments from private firms about the numbers of patients who will be treated every month in return for the £400m payments.

    6. Which of the following can be reasonably inferred from the text?
  • 0
    0

    Explanation

    The correct answer is C.

    In this question, statement D is a causation statement so remember to carefully read the text and make sure the reason is correct and not just the fact. Statement B might be a good place to start, because it has good keywords.

    Statement A has the keyword ‘treatments’, which is found in the first paragraph. Here, it explains that there is quite a ‘broad range of treatments’ included, so this statement is untrue.

    Statement B has the keyword Covid-19, which is in the second paragraph. Here, it says that due to Covid-19 the NHS effectively gained control of the private sector, and not the other way around as in the statement.

    Statement C has the key words ‘commitments’ and ‘private firms’ which is found in the final paragraph. It says the treasury has urged the NHS to seek more commitments, implying that private firms have not made enough of these so this statement can be inferred.

    Statement D has the keyword ‘backlog’, which is found in the first paragraph. Here, it explains that the backlog caused by Covid is more of a problem because hospitals are operating at lower capacity, not that the backlog causes this lower capacity.

    Common trap!
    Sometimes causation statements will have a correct subject but an incorrect reason. In this case, the cause and effect are reversed! The backlog has caused the lower capacity, not the other way round.

    Post Comment

    Matt Hancock, the health secretary, and NHS bosses are pushing for a £5bn-a-year deal to treat NHS patients in private hospitals and tackle a spiralling backlog amid the coronavirus pandemic, the Guardian has learned. But the Treasury is blocking the plan, which could cover a broad range of treatments including cancer surgery, joint operations and cataract removals amid concerns that it will not offer value for money.

    The Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) and NHS England want the Treasury to fund an extension of a contract that has resulted in scores of private hospitals being paid about £400m a month to perform procedures since the start of the pandemic, when the NHS suspended swathes of non-urgent treatment to prioritise Covid-19 patients. The deal, agreed in March, in effect gave the NHS control of the private sector’s 8,000 beds, 680 operating theatres and 20,000 staff, though there were concerns that many hospitals stood near-empty during the Covid-19 crisis. It has never confirmed how much the scheme costs.

    Health bosses believe extra capacity is vital if the NHS is to avoid the number of people waiting for treatment in England hitting 10 million by the end of the year, as predicted by the NHS Confederation last week. NHS chiefs told the Guardian this projection was a realistic outcome, especially as the need for physical distancing means hospital bosses project they will be able to operate at only 60-70% of normal capacity.

    Reservations at the Treasury are so strong, however, that it has refused to sign off the deal, which the DHSC and NHS England’s chief executive, Simon Stevens, had already agreed with representatives of big private hospital groups such as Spire Healthcare, Ramsay Health Care and HCA International. At the start of the month the Treasury stepped in at the 11th hour to stop the DHSC from announcing the deal and has told NHS England to get more detailed commitments from private firms about the numbers of patients who will be treated every month in return for the £400m payments.

    7. Which of the following statements is correct, according to the text?
  • 0
    0

    Explanation

    The correct answer is B.

    Here, all the statements have excellent keywords. However, statement C uses extreme language so you could skip it if you were short on time on your run-through.

    Statement A has the keyword ’10 million’ which is found in the third paragraph. It is actually given as a prediction by the NHS federation, not the current figure of patients waiting for treatment.

    Statement B has the keyword of any figures regarding the private sector. The text says that there are 20,000 staff and 8,000 beds, so the sector does have 2.5x the number of staff than beds.

    Statement C has the keyword ‘Spire Healthcare’, which is found in the final paragraph. This is extreme language, and although Spire Healthcare is described and one of the ‘big’ private groups, the text does not say it is ‘the biggest’ so, this extreme statement goes too far.

    Statement D has the name Simon Stevens which is a good keyword. The text says ‘the DHSC and NHS England’s Chief exec, Simon Stevens’, so in this sentence Stevens is identified as the chief exec of the NHS, not the DHSC.

    Post Comment

    A global search from the deserts of Mongolia to the highlands of Argentina has revealed the first soft-shelled dinosaur eggs ever discovered, providing a new glimpse into how dinosaurs laid their eggs and parented their young. The emerging picture is that, reproductively speaking, the earliest dinosaurs were like modern reptiles, which generally bury their eggs in nests or burrows and don’t stick around to tend them.

    The revelation comes from two teams of international researchers, who have presented stunning new fossils of ancient soft-shelled eggs as old as 200 million years. One group describes the first soft eggshells ever identified among dinosaurs, while the other presents the first fossil egg ever discovered in Antarctica—possibly from a marine reptile—which also seems to have had a soft shell.

    The fossils’ mere existence, let alone the quality of their preservation, has left scientists astounded. “How does the saying go: There’s more things on heaven and Earth than we’ve ever imagined?” says Julia Clarke, a palaeontologist at the University of Texas at Austin and a co-author of one of the two studies, both unveiled in today in the journal Nature.

    Past dinosaur egg discoveries going back decades featured hard eggshells like those laid by modern birds, dinosaurs’ only living descendants. Bird eggshells contain a layer of the mineral calcite, which makes them stronger and harder, allowing birds to sit on their eggs, or brood, to incubate them. As such, palaeontologists most often imagined dinosaurs using similar parenting strategies. But these eggs almost always were dated to the Cretaceous period, late in dinosaur evolution. Now, the mystery of the missing earlier eggs may have an explanation: In all likelihood, they were soft and leathery, which made them more likely to degrade and not fossilize.

    8. Which of the following is true, according to the passage?
  • 0
    0

    Explanation

    The correct answer is D.

    In this question, all the statements have excellent keywords but A and C have names of places, which are particularly easy to find so you may want to start with these ones.

    Statement A has the keyword Mongolia, which you would see on your initial read through of the first couple of sentences. Although the text says the search spanned from Mongolia to Argentina, it does not say that anything was actually found here. Therefore, this is not the answer.

    Statement B has the keyword soft-shelled, which is hyphenated so more easily identifiable. In the text, it is seen twice but once again, the first sentence gives you the answer here that these are the first fossils. From this alone, you could assume that we cannot tell the answer so it cannot be true. However, the text in fact confirms this with the quote which has an incredulous tone about the discovery in the third paragraph.

    Statement C has the keyword Antarctica, and this is a very slight passage adjustment which you need to look carefully to see. In fact, the fossil of a soft-shelled dinosaur egg was found in Antarctica, not the same thing as the egg itself.

    Statement D has the keyword calcite and is otherwise straightforward. This is found in the final paragraph, which confirms that calcite is the mineral which hardens bird eggs.

    Timing tip!
    Always, always remember to read the first couple of sentences of the passage! This is for 3
    reasons:
    1. You only have to read it once, it doesn’t use that much time
    2. It helps you understand the tone of the passage, and what the subject is
    3. It may answer statements for you, for instance here it answers A and B immediately!

    Post Comment

    A global search from the deserts of Mongolia to the highlands of Argentina has revealed the first soft-shelled dinosaur eggs ever discovered, providing a new glimpse into how dinosaurs laid their eggs and parented their young. The emerging picture is that, reproductively speaking, the earliest dinosaurs were like modern reptiles, which generally bury their eggs in nests or burrows and don’t stick around to tend them.

    The revelation comes from two teams of international researchers, who have presented stunning new fossils of ancient soft-shelled eggs as old as 200 million years. One group describes the first soft eggshells ever identified among dinosaurs, while the other presents the first fossil egg ever discovered in Antarctica—possibly from a marine reptile—which also seems to have had a soft shell.

    The fossils’ mere existence, let alone the quality of their preservation, has left scientists astounded. “How does the saying go: There’s more things on heaven and Earth than we’ve ever imagined?” says Julia Clarke, a palaeontologist at the University of Texas at Austin and a co-author of one of the two studies, both unveiled in today in the journal Nature.

    Past dinosaur egg discoveries going back decades featured hard eggshells like those laid by modern birds, dinosaurs’ only living descendants. Bird eggshells contain a layer of the mineral calcite, which makes them stronger and harder, allowing birds to sit on their eggs, or brood, to incubate them. As such, palaeontologists most often imagined dinosaurs using similar parenting strategies. But these eggs almost always were dated to the Cretaceous period, late in dinosaur evolution. Now, the mystery of the missing earlier eggs may have an explanation: In all likelihood, they were soft and leathery, which made them more likely to degrade and not fossilize.

    9. Which of the following statements is true, according to the passage?
  • 1
    0

    Explanation

    The correct answer is C.

    In this question, statement B has the best keyword so you should start here rather than at the beginning.

    Statement A has the keyword ‘reptiles’, which is found at the end of the first paragraph where it says that dinosaurs may have behaved more like modern reptiles. However, later on it says birds are the only remaining descendants.

    Statement B has the keyword Cretaceous, which is found in the final paragraph where this period is defined as being late in dinosaur evolution. Therefore, this is not true.

    Statement C has the keyword ‘birds’, which is discussed in the final paragraph. The sentence ‘palaeontologists always imagined dinosaurs using similar parenting techniques’ confirms this statement as true.

    Statement D has the keyword ‘fossilise’, which is again in the final paragraph. Actually, according to the text, the lack of fossilisation was because the shells were soft, not because of the hatching process.

    Post Comment

    With demand for bicycles soaring, and nations preparing to spend billions to redesign their cities with a new focus on cycling and walking, it’s worth remembering the importance of the bicycle in the late 19th century. It was a hugely disruptive technology and for a few years in the 1890s, the bicycle was the ultimate must-have—swift, affordable, stylish transportation that could whisk you anywhere you cared to go, anytime you liked, for free.

    Almost anyone could learn to ride, and almost everyone did. The sultan of Zanzibar took up cycling. The amir of Kabul bought bicycles for his entire harem. But it was the middle and working classes around the globe that truly made the bicycle their own. For the first time in history, the masses were mobile. No more need for expensive horses and carriages. The “people’s nag,” as the bicycle was known, was lightweight, affordable, easy to maintain, and also the fastest thing on the roads.

    Society was transformed. Women were especially enthusiastic, taking to the road in droves. “I think bicycling has done more to emancipate women than anything else in the world,” Susan B. Anthony said in an interview with the New York Sunday World in 1896.

    By 1898 cycling had become such a popular activity in the United States that the New York Journal of Commerce claimed it was costing restaurants and theatres more than $100 million a year in lost business. Bicycle manufacturing became one of America’s biggest and most innovative industries. A third of all patent applications were bicycle related—so many that the U.S. patent office had to build a separate annex to deal with them all.
    (Adapted from https://www.nationalgeographic.com/history/2020/06/how-bicycles-transformed-world/)

    10. Which of the following statements is true, according to the passage?
  • 0
    0

    Explanation

    The correct answer is A.

    Here, statements A and C have the best keywords because they have numbers, whereas ‘the 19 the century’ is quite general. Therefore, you could assess A and D first then the others.

    Statement A has the date ‘1898’, which is found in the final paragraph. Here, it explains that 1/3 of patents were bicycle-related, so this means that the majority were not bicycle related.

    Statement B has the keyword ‘feminist movement’ and mention of the positive impacts of bicycles on women is in the third paragraph. If bikes had such a positive impact on the lives of women in the 19 th century, it is safe to assume that they did not cause problems for the feminist movement.

    Statement C has the key phrase ‘horse-and-carriage’, which is found in the second paragraph where it says ‘there was no more need for… horses and carriages’. Therefore, this is not true.

    Statement D has the keyword $100 million which is found in the final paragraph. According to the New York Journal of Commerce, the cost was $100mil a year, not overall.

    Post Comment

    With demand for bicycles soaring, and nations preparing to spend billions to redesign their cities with a new focus on cycling and walking, it’s worth remembering the importance of the bicycle in the late 19th century. It was a hugely disruptive technology and for a few years in the 1890s, the bicycle was the ultimate must-have—swift, affordable, stylish transportation that could whisk you anywhere you cared to go, anytime you liked, for free.

    Almost anyone could learn to ride, and almost everyone did. The sultan of Zanzibar took up cycling. The amir of Kabul bought bicycles for his entire harem. But it was the middle and working classes around the globe that truly made the bicycle their own. For the first time in history, the masses were mobile. No more need for expensive horses and carriages. The “people’s nag,” as the bicycle was known, was lightweight, affordable, easy to maintain, and also the fastest thing on the roads.

    Society was transformed. Women were especially enthusiastic, taking to the road in droves. “I think bicycling has done more to emancipate women than anything else in the world,” Susan B. Anthony said in an interview with the New York Sunday World in 1896.

    By 1898 cycling had become such a popular activity in the United States that the New York Journal of Commerce claimed it was costing restaurants and theatres more than $100 million a year in lost business. Bicycle manufacturing became one of America’s biggest and most innovative industries. A third of all patent applications were bicycle related—so many that the U.S. patent office had to build a separate annex to deal with them all.
    (Adapted from https://www.nationalgeographic.com/history/2020/06/how-bicycles-transformed-world/)

    11. Which of the following can be reasonably inferred from the article?
  • 0
    0

    Explanation

    The correct answer is B.

    Here, statements A and B are extreme statements which can be discounted if you are short on time. However, statement D has a very good keyword so you could start here and work backwards.

    Statement A has a key date, which is not found directly in the text but dates shortly before it are. It is an extreme statement, which would be almost impossible to infer in any case therefore it is not true.

    Statement B has the keyword ‘society’, which is found in the third paragraph. Here, it says that ‘society was transformed’ after the advent of the bicycle, so this is a very reasonable inference.

    Statement C has the keyword ‘dangerous’, which is not found in the text so this is not a reasonable inference.

    Statement D has the keyword Kabul, which is found in the second paragraph. Although the amir of Kabul bought bikes for his whole harem, we cannot infer that this means cycling was the main form of transport in Kabul.

    Common trap!
    Statement D here is an extreme statement which is based on a vaguely extreme statement from the text; ‘The amir of Kabul bought bikes for his entire harem’. This statement is not to say that bicycles were the most popular form of transport in Kabul.

    Post Comment

    Colgate-Palmolive is reviewing the brand Darlie as firms reassess race stereotypes in products.

    The name of the popular Chinese brand translates as “black person toothpaste”. It is owned by Colgate and its joint venture partner Hawley & Hazel and sold widely across Asia. The toothpaste brand was originally called Darkie before it was changed to Darlie in 1989, following pressure from shareholders and other groups.

    “For more than 35 years, we have been working together to evolve the brand, including substantial changes to the name, logo and packaging. We are currently working with our partner to review and further evolve all aspects of the brand, including the brand name,” a Colgate spokesman said.

    Colgate paid $50m (£40m) in 1985 for 50% of Hong Kong-based Hawley & Hazel, the maker of Darlie. The brand controls 17% of the toothpaste market in China, 21% in Singapore, 28% in Malaysia and 25% in Taiwan. On Wednesday, PepsiCo said it was changing its Aunt Jemima branding, while other food brands featuring African American characters are reviewing their logos. Mars said it was even considering possible changes to the branding of its Uncle Ben’s rice.

    Racial injustice is under the spotlight following the death of African American George Floyd while being detained by police. Corporate and many British firms have been under pressure, including brewer Greene King, Lloyd’s of London and banks RBS and Lloyds Banking Group.

    (Adapted from https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-53103008)

    12. Which of the following is true, according to the passage?
  • 0
    0

    Explanation

    The correct answer is B.

    Here, all the statements have good keywords however statement C is extreme, so should be treated with caution.

    Statement A has the keywords ‘China’ and ‘Singapore’, which are found alongside numerical data in the third paragraph. We see that Colgate controls 17% of the Chinese market but 21% of the Singaporean market, so this statement is false.

    Statement B has the keywords ‘Mars’ and ‘Uncle Ben’s’. In the third paragraph, it says Mars considered changing the brand Uncle Ben’s, so it is reasonable to infer that they own this brand.

    Statement C has the keyword ‘Darlie’, which is found in the first paragraph as an example of a firm which has changed branding recently, so it has changed since conception.

    Statement D has the keyword Hawley and Hazel, in the third paragraph it says that Colgate paid for 50% of Hawley and Hazel, not that they own them.

    Post Comment

    Singing in falsetto is, by definition, a kind of false projection into the world. About a decade ago, when Justin Vernon, the principal member of Bon Iver, was recording the songs that became the band’s début album, “For Emma, Forever Ago,” he realized that ranging just above his usual register made it easier to sing about memories that were otherwise too painful to recount. His recordings gave the impression of someone forcing himself to venture far outside his comfort zone.

    “For Emma,” which was released in 2007, became the type of album that fans believe has magical, healing qualities. Vernon had lived the kind of quaint, rooted existence that seems increasingly rare, given the cosmopolitan ambitions of most professional musicians. Born and raised in Eau Claire, Vernon moved to Raleigh, North Carolina, with some friends, to try to make it as a band. Within a year, about a quarter of which Vernon spent bedridden with mononucleosis and then with a liver infection, his relationships were in shambles. He retreated to his father’s cabin, in the woods of Wisconsin, where, after spending a few weeks drinking beer and watching movies, he picked up his acoustic guitar and started working.

    The odd thing about Vernon’s music, which fans related to because of its folksy vulnerability, was how much he withheld. His songs felt authentic and intimate, yet they were filled with invented places and characters, private symbols, and impressionistic scraps of language. Emma wasn’t a person, he explained, but a foggy, wallowing state of mind. Do we listen to a musician’s melancholy songs because we want him to feel better, or because it’s comforting to know that people who are famous and accomplished don’t have it all figured out, either?

    (Adapted from https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2016/10/03/bon-ivers-new-voice)

    13. Which of the following statements can be inferred from the text?
  • 0
    0

    Explanation

    The correct answer is B.

    Here, statements A, C and D have good keywords. Therefore, you could skip B on your initial run through.

    Statement A has the keyword ‘Emma’, which you will see is the name of the first studio album. However, in the final paragraph it says that Vernon explained Emma to be a ‘foggy, wallowing state of mind’, not a person.

    Statement B has the keyword ‘band’, but more specifically you should search for references to starting a band. This is found in the second paragraph which explains that Vernon moved away to Raleigh to try and start a band, confirming the statement.

    Statement C has the keyword French Canada, which is not found in the text at all. Although the text explains that Vernon was born in Eau Claire, we cannot infer that this is in French Canada because we must exclude any external knowledge.

    Statement D has the keyword mononucleosis, and although the text says that Vernon was unwell for much of the year when his relationships went downhill, not that there was a causative relationship between these events.

    Post Comment

    Singing in falsetto is, by definition, a kind of false projection into the world. About a decade ago, when Justin Vernon, the principal member of Bon Iver, was recording the songs that became the band’s début album, “For Emma, Forever Ago,” he realized that ranging just above his usual register made it easier to sing about memories that were otherwise too painful to recount. His recordings gave the impression of someone forcing himself to venture far outside his comfort zone.

    “For Emma,” which was released in 2007, became the type of album that fans believe has magical, healing qualities. Vernon had lived the kind of quaint, rooted existence that seems increasingly rare, given the cosmopolitan ambitions of most professional musicians. Born and raised in Eau Claire, Vernon moved to Raleigh, North Carolina, with some friends, to try to make it as a band. Within a year, about a quarter of which Vernon spent bedridden with mononucleosis and then with a liver infection, his relationships were in shambles. He retreated to his father’s cabin, in the woods of Wisconsin, where, after spending a few weeks drinking beer and watching movies, he picked up his acoustic guitar and started working.

    The odd thing about Vernon’s music, which fans related to because of its folksy vulnerability, was how much he withheld. His songs felt authentic and intimate, yet they were filled with invented places and characters, private symbols, and impressionistic scraps of language. Emma wasn’t a person, he explained, but a foggy, wallowing state of mind. Do we listen to a musician’s melancholy songs because we want him to feel better, or because it’s comforting to know that people who are famous and accomplished don’t have it all figured out, either?

    (Adapted from https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2016/10/03/bon-ivers-new-voice)

    14. Which of the following is true, according to the passage?
  • 0
    0

    Explanation

    The correct answer is A.

    Here, statements A, B and D have good keywords so starting with A is a reasonable way to get on with this question.

    Statement A has the keyword ‘acoustic guitar’, which is found in the text in the second paragraph. Here, it says that when Vernon started writing he ‘picked up his acoustic guitar’, therefore it is a reasonable inference that this is an instrument he uses.

    Statement B has the keyword Wisconsin, which is found in the second paragraph. However, the cabin is described as his father’s, so this is a slight passage adjustment and untrue.

    Statement C has the keyword ‘odd’, and ‘relates’. You will see in the final paragraph that people relate ‘because of… folksy vulnerability’, but the odd thing is ‘how much he withheld’. Therefore, this is not a true statement.

    Statement D has the keywords ‘first album’ and, of course, 2008. 2008 is a better keyword, because searching for ‘first album’ will only give you the name of the album, not the publication date. You will see that the album was actually published in 2007, not 2008.

    Timing tip!
    When the keyword is a date, as in statement D, make sure you search for dates in general! If the passage is date heavy, you could also look for dates within a reasonable range of the date in the statement.

    Post Comment

    At NASA Jet Propulsion Lab, engineers, scientists, and skilled technicians design interplanetary spacecraft and schemes to get them to their extraordinary destinations. Europa mission plans have always come in pretty expensive, because everybody figured that we’d have to land there and drill through many kilometres of solid ice, potentially contaminating any ecosystem that might already be there. But if we can analyse samples flung out into space, there’s virtually no chance of contamination, and there’s no need to build landing gear, drills, or complex anchor and tether systems. It would be much cheaper than anyone had calculated.

    People everywhere know and respect NASA. It’s the best brand the United States has. But like everything else, the agency’s budget has been reduced over the years; it hasn’t kept up with inflation.

    Within NASA’s budget is a line for planetary science. It’s the part of NASA that does the most amazing things. Other space agencies put spacecraft in orbit around the Earth; a few even go to Mars. But no other space agency on Earth can land anything on Mars, let alone lower a small car there from a rocket-powered crane. The expertise is here in the United States. It allows people here to solve interplanetary problems that have never been solved before. It leads to innovation that produces $3.60 for every dollar that goes in.

    Just think what it would mean if we were to find a living thing in a geyser of seawater on  another world. Every one of us here on Earth would stop and ponder what it means to be a living thing. I hope it would fill each of us with reverence for the cosmos and for our place
    within it. A mission to Europa would bring humankind together—and perhaps change the world.

    (Adapted from https://www.nationalgeographic.com/news/2014/6/140618-europa-bill-nye-
    jupiter-extraterrestrial-life-nasa/)

    15. Which of the following is true, according to the passage?
  • 0
    1

    Explanation

    The correct answer is A.

    Here, statements B and D are extreme statements, and statement C has a good keyword so you could start with C, then A.

    Statement A has the keyword ‘innovations’, or you could look for financial figures. Both are found in the third paragraph at the end. The author explains that NASA’s innovations make around $3.60 per dollar put in, therefore these innovations do cause financial growth.

    Statement B has the keyword ‘drills’ which is found in the first paragraph. However, it actually implies that drills are expensive for spacecraft, and we certainly cannot infer that they are the cheapest.

    Statement C has the keyword ‘Europa’, and reading around you might initially think this statement is true. However, you need to gauge the tone of the paragraph which is implying Europa is a good target because of the jets which could be analysed from orbit.

    Statement D has the keyword NASA, but this is quite general so ‘orbit’ works better. You will see that in the third paragraph it says ‘a few even go to Mars’, so other agencies have achieved orbit, just not landed things.

    Post Comment

    A mission 10 years in the making, NASA is one month out from launching the Perseverance rover to Mars. This rover, launching during a pandemic, will carry a tribute to health care workers around the world. The 3-by-5-inch aluminium plate, installed on the left side of the
    rover chassis, shows Earth supported by the symbol of the serpent entwined around a rod, dating back to ancient Hippocrates, to represent the global medical community. A line represents the rover’s trajectory from Central Florida to Mars, according to NASA.

    “We wanted to demonstrate our appreciation for those who have put their personal well-being on the line for the good of others,” said Matt Wallace, Perseverance deputy project manager at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California, in a statement.

    When Alexander Mather, a seventh-grade student in Virginia, entered his submission in a nationwide contest last year to name the rover, a pandemic wasn’t on the horizon. But his winning entry for Perseverance has proven to be the perfect name for a rover launching during unprecedented times. These last few months of preparing the rover for launch have happened during the constraints of safe operation during a pandemic. But the teams rose to the challenge, and the launch remains on schedule.

    “The team never wavered in its pursuit of the launch pad,” said Michael Watkins, director of NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, in a statement. “It was through their dedication and the help of other NASA facilities that we have made it this far.”

    (Adapted from https://edition.cnn.com/2020/06/20/world/nasa-mars-perseverance-rover-scn/index.html)

    16. Which of the following statements can be reasonably inferred from the passage?
  • 0
    0

    Explanation

    The correct answer is D.

    In this question, statement C is an extreme statement so is harder to infer. All the other statements have passable keywords, so you could run through from A to D skipping C on your initial pass.

     Statement A has the key phrase ‘seventh-grade’, which is found in the third paragraph. It is explained that the seventh-grade student entered the competition to name the probe, not to design the plate.

     Statement B has the key phrase ‘deputy project manager’. This is found in the second paragraph which is a quote from this manager. Although he commends healthcare staff, it is not stated that the plate was his idea anywhere. Therefore, this statement cannot be reasonably inferred.

     Statement C has the keyword ‘challenges’ and ‘pandemic’. Although the text says some months of work have occurred with social distancing, we can reasonably assume that normal challenges associated with space travel are not associated with the pandemic.

     Statement D has the keyword ‘serpent’, which is found in the first paragraph. This symbol, according to the passage, ‘dates back to ancient Hippocrates’, so must be an old symbol.

    Post Comment

    A mission 10 years in the making, NASA is one month out from launching the Perseverance rover to Mars. This rover, launching during a pandemic, will carry a tribute to health care workers around the world. The 3-by-5-inch aluminium plate, installed on the left side of the
    rover chassis, shows Earth supported by the symbol of the serpent entwined around a rod, dating back to ancient Hippocrates, to represent the global medical community. A line represents the rover’s trajectory from Central Florida to Mars, according to NASA.

    “We wanted to demonstrate our appreciation for those who have put their personal well-being on the line for the good of others,” said Matt Wallace, Perseverance deputy project manager at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California, in a statement.

    When Alexander Mather, a seventh-grade student in Virginia, entered his submission in a nationwide contest last year to name the rover, a pandemic wasn’t on the horizon. But his winning entry for Perseverance has proven to be the perfect name for a rover launching during unprecedented times. These last few months of preparing the rover for launch have happened during the constraints of safe operation during a pandemic. But the teams rose to the challenge, and the launch remains on schedule.

    “The team never wavered in its pursuit of the launch pad,” said Michael Watkins, director of NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, in a statement. “It was through their dedication and the help of other NASA facilities that we have made it this far.”

    (Adapted from https://edition.cnn.com/2020/06/20/world/nasa-mars-perseverance-rover-scn/index.html)

    17. Which of the following is true, according to the passage?
  • 0
    0

    Explanation

    The correct answer is B.

    In this question, all statements except C have very easy-to-identify keywords.

     Statement A has a key number – this is a slight passage adjustment. In fact, if you search for dimensions you will see that the dimensions were 3×5 inches. Therefore, the area is in inches not centimetres.

    Statement B has the key phrase ‘Central Florida’, which is found in the first paragraph which confirms the Rover will launch from Central Florida. The text does not confirm where the rover will land, so C is incorrect, and B is correct.

    Statement D has the keyword pandemic, which is found in the third paragraph. Although the text acknowledges the poignancy of the name given the pandemic, it was named before the pandemic.

    Timing tip!

    If you find the answer, don’t keep reading! You need to be confident that you have the right answer and keep moving to get the best score possible.

    Post Comment

    A new Banksy artwork has appeared at Southampton General Hospital. The largely monochrome painting, which is one square metre, was hung in collaboration with the hospital’s managers in a foyer near the emergency department. It shows a young boy kneeling by a wastepaper basket dressed in dungarees and a T-shirt. He has discarded his Spiderman and Batman model figures in the basket in favour of a new favourite action hero – an NHS nurse. The nurse’s arm is outstretched and pointing forward in the fashion of Superman on a mission. She is wearing a facemask, a nurse’s cape, and an apron with the Red Cross emblem (the only element of colour in the picture). The artist left a note for hospital workers, which read: “Thanks for all you’re doing. I hope this brightens the place up a bit, even if it’s only black and white.”

    Paula Head, CEO of the University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust said: “Our hospital family has been directly impacted with the tragic loss of much loved and respected members of staff and friends to the virus. The fact that Banksy has chosen us to recognise the outstanding contribution everyone in and with the NHS is making, in unprecedented times, is a huge honour.”

    She added: “It will be really valued by everyone in the hospital, as people get a moment in their busy lives to pause, reflect and appreciate this piece of art. It will no doubt also be a massive boost to morale for everyone who works and is cared for at our hospital.”

    The artwork is now on view to staff and patients on Level C of the Southampton General.

    (Adapted from https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-52556544)

    18. Which of the following statements is true, according to the passage?
  • 0
    0

    Explanation

    The correct answer is D.

    Here, statement C has the best keyword therefore you could start here. Statement A is an extreme statement, so you could skip this and start at B.

     Statement A has the key phrase ‘black and white’, but you could search for any words relating to colour. The painting is described as ‘largely monochrome’, whereas it does explain that there is a red cross which is in colour. Therefore, the piece is not entirely black and white. 

     Statement B has the keyword Banksy, but the article is actually about a Banksy piece so you may want to use the more specific keyword ‘note’. The text says that the note was actually for hospital workers in general, not just nurses.

     Statement C has the key name ‘Paula Head’, which is easy to find in the second paragraph. Her position is in fact CEO, not clinical lead.

     Statement D has the keyword ‘anyone’, which is not found in the text, so instead you need to carefully search for references to who can view it. The final sentence says the painting is on display ‘on view to staff and patients’, so can be viewed by anyone.

    Post Comment

    A new Banksy artwork has appeared at Southampton General Hospital. The largely monochrome painting, which is one square metre, was hung in collaboration with the hospital’s managers in a foyer near the emergency department. It shows a young boy kneeling by a wastepaper basket dressed in dungarees and a T-shirt. He has discarded his Spiderman and Batman model figures in the basket in favour of a new favourite action hero – an NHS nurse. The nurse’s arm is outstretched and pointing forward in the fashion of Superman on a mission. She is wearing a facemask, a nurse’s cape, and an apron with the Red Cross emblem (the only element of colour in the picture). The artist left a note for hospital workers, which read: “Thanks for all you’re doing. I hope this brightens the place up a bit, even if it’s only black and white.”

    Paula Head, CEO of the University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust said: “Our hospital family has been directly impacted with the tragic loss of much loved and respected members of staff and friends to the virus. The fact that Banksy has chosen us to recognise the outstanding contribution everyone in and with the NHS is making, in unprecedented times, is a huge honour.”

    She added: “It will be really valued by everyone in the hospital, as people get a moment in their busy lives to pause, reflect and appreciate this piece of art. It will no doubt also be a massive boost to morale for everyone who works and is cared for at our hospital.”

    The artwork is now on view to staff and patients on Level C of the Southampton General.

    (Adapted from https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-52556544)

    19. Which of the following statements is true, according to the passage?
  • 0
    0

    Explanation

    The correct answer is D.

    In this question, statement C is extreme whereas statement B has useful keywords; the dimensions of the painting. D also has the capitalised nouns ‘Batman and Superman’ which make for good keywords. Therefore, you might want to start with B and D, skipping C.

    Statement A has the keyword ‘uniform’ and ‘nurse’. You will find mention of the nurse’s attire in the first paragraph, where it describes her as wearing a ‘cape’. This is not a normal nurse’s uniform, so this statement is untrue.

    Statement B has the keyword ‘dimensions’, and in the first sentence the painting is described as ‘one square metre’, so the statement dimensions are incorrect.

    Statement C has the keyword ‘died’, and is an extreme statement so treat it suspiciously. No particular mention is made of deaths, but Paula Head does mention staff who have been lost to the virus, so this statement is untrue.

    Statement D has the keywords ‘Batman and Superman’, which is found in the first paragraph. Here, it says the child in the picture has discarded Batman and Superman ‘in the basket’, so they are in the picture.

    Post Comment
    Emily Medicmind Tutor

    Sun, 23 Jul 2023 16:58:01

    How can D be correct when the statement says the picture includes ‘Batman and Superman action figures’ but the passage says ‘He has discarded his Spiderman and Batman model figures in the basket in favour of a new favourite action hero – an NHS nurse.’ With Spiderman and Superman not being the same?

    The most obvious thing the Canon fp camera gets right is its basic concept: a tiny video module (that can also take nice stills) stripped back to its core functions so that it can be adapted to suit all manner of situations. To deliver on this underlying idea, a lot of work has clearly been done to provide the features that videographers will want. For a start, there is a waveform display that provides a hugely useful way to assess exposure within a scene, and one that videographers will be familiar with.

    Then there’s the option to report exposure time as shutter angle, rather than shutter speed. The actual terminology can appear somewhat esoteric when you first encounter it, but even without worrying about what specific ‘angles’ might mean, it means you can easily change the frame rate you’re shooting at without having to adjust the exposure time to match. The way the zebra exposure warnings are handled will also be familiar to users of higher-end video gear: the fp gives you a choice of using zebras to indicate highlights (ie: indicate the areas exposed at 95% or brighter) or to monitor a specific exposure region (ie shot areas exposed as 70% with an adjustable tolerance level on either side). All of these are key videography tools.

    But perhaps the defining feature of the camera is its ability to record CinemaDNG files to an external SSD. There are some drawbacks to this: CinemaDNG can be a bit of a handful and isn’t especially widely supported and, like the Nikon Z6, the footage is sub-sampled to keep the data sizes manageable, increasing the risk of moire. But it lets the fp output files that are more gradable than Log footage without requiring investment in any unusual card formats.

    (Adapted from https://www.dpreview.com/articles/4708478348/compact-capable-and-imperfect-first-impressions-of-the-sigma-fp)

    20. Which of the following statements is true, according to the passage?
  • 0
    0

    Explanation

    The correct answer is A.

    In this question, statement D has the best keyword so you may want to start here. None of the statements are extreme.

    Statement A has the keyword ‘waveform display’, which is found in the first paragraph. The passage directly says that waveform display is a ‘hugely useful way to assess exposure’, so this statement is true.

    Statement B has the keyword ‘videographers’ and again, ‘waveform display’. The text actually says that this is a tool videographers will be familiar with, so they probably do not prefer to work without it.

    Statement C has the keyword ‘Zebra’, which is unusual so easily identifiable in the second paragraph of the text. Here, it actually says that such technology is ‘familiar to users of higher-end video gear’, not mid-range.

    Statement D has the keyword Nikon Z6, found in the final paragraph. Actually, the text says ‘like the Nikon Z6’, so we can infer that this camera uses the same technique.

    Post Comment

    The most obvious thing the Canon fp camera gets right is its basic concept: a tiny video module (that can also take nice stills) stripped back to its core functions so that it can be adapted to suit all manner of situations. To deliver on this underlying idea, a lot of work has clearly been done to provide the features that videographers will want. For a start, there is a waveform display that provides a hugely useful way to assess exposure within a scene, and one that videographers will be familiar with.

    Then there’s the option to report exposure time as shutter angle, rather than shutter speed. The actual terminology can appear somewhat esoteric when you first encounter it, but even without worrying about what specific ‘angles’ might mean, it means you can easily change the frame rate you’re shooting at without having to adjust the exposure time to match. The way the zebra exposure warnings are handled will also be familiar to users of higher-end video gear: the fp gives you a choice of using zebras to indicate highlights (ie: indicate the areas exposed at 95% or brighter) or to monitor a specific exposure region (ie shot areas exposed as 70% with an adjustable tolerance level on either side). All of these are key videography tools.

    But perhaps the defining feature of the camera is its ability to record CinemaDNG files to an external SSD. There are some drawbacks to this: CinemaDNG can be a bit of a handful and isn’t especially widely supported and, like the Nikon Z6, the footage is sub-sampled to keep the data sizes manageable, increasing the risk of moire. But it lets the fp output files that are more gradable than Log footage without requiring investment in any unusual card formats.

    (Adapted from https://www.dpreview.com/articles/4708478348/compact-capable-and-imperfect-first-impressions-of-the-sigma-fp)

    21. Which of the following statements can be reasonably inferred from the passage?
  • 0
    0

    Explanation

    The correct answer is D.

    In this question, we are looking for reasonable inferences; you will want to use keywords to quickly assess if the statement is something that can be drawn from the text or not. Statements A and C have the best keywords, so you may want to start here.

    Statement A has the keyword ‘Nikon Z6’. When we assess the text, the Nikon Z6 is just used as a point of comparison for one feature, so we cannot assume either camera is ‘better’ from the passage alone.

    Statement B has the keyword ‘shutter angle’. Although the text says that the fp uses shutter angle to report exposure time, it does not explain alternate methods other than shutter speed. Therefore, there might be an unmentioned better way to report this.

    Statement C has the keyword Cinema DNG, explained in the final paragraph. It is not ideal because the text says ‘there are some drawbacks to this’.

    Statement D has the key phrase ‘high exposure’, which is found in the second paragraph. This feature is listed amongst others in a paragraph which concludes with ‘all of these are key videography tools’, therefore we can infer that videographers benefit from it.

    Post Comment

    Long-distance running times are dropping – and the first sub-two hour marathon was completed recently by Eliud Kipchoge. Some are arguing that innovations in trainer design are playing a pivotal role in these improvements.

    A running shoe should protect the foot and the runner from injury. It provides stabilisation of the foot and protects skin from damage. It should also limit potentially harmful impact forces as the foot strikes the ground, while returning energy to the runner. Running shoes are designed in a way that improves running efficiency. Science suggests that if you can reduce the energy it takes to run, then in theory, you should be able to run faster and for a longer period.

    To do this, a number of techniques can be adopted. First, we can reduce the mass of a shoe to make it lighter. This will allow a runner to swing their legs more efficiently. Another claim is that if there is more cushioning in the midsole, then an athlete can run with straighter legs, again making them more efficient. Adding stiff plates within the [midsole], may also help an athlete to run better by redistributing positive lower limb joint work from the knee to the joint of your toes above the ball of your foot. These stiff plates may also store and return energy to the runner.

    In general, when we compress this midsole, and then release it, we want as much energy as possible to be returned. The more energy that is returned, the more efficiently an athlete should be able to run. It can, of course, be difficult to design tests that systematically explore all these factors, but they are being explored by science.

    (Adapted from https://www.rte.ie/brainstorm/2020/0128/1111506-science-of-running-shoes/)

    22. Which of the following can be reasonably inferred from the passage?
  • 0
    0

    Explanation

    The correct answer is C.

    In this question, statement A has a good keyword whereas statement B is an extreme statement. You may want to tackle this question by skipping statement B on the initial readthrough.

     Statement A has the keyword ‘Eliud Kipchoge’, who is mentioned in the first paragraph. He is Kenyan, however this is not explicitly mentioned in the text therefore it cannot be inferred.

     Statement B has the keyword ‘lighter’, which is found in the third paragraph. It is an extreme statement, and it is not reasonable to infer that this will always improve the speed of the runner.

     Statement C has the keyword ‘stiff plates’, which is found in the third paragraph. Unlike statement B, this is a tempered statement which is a reasonable inference as these plates may, or may not, but the possibility is still presented in the text.

     Statement D has the keyword ‘skin’, which is found in the second paragraph listed among other functions of the running shoe. A hierarchy is not apparent in this list, therefore, this statement is not a reasonable inference.

    Post Comment

    A distinguishing characteristic of the biomedical model is its compartmentalized view of man. This way of seeing human beings has its origin in Ancient Greek thought; it was stated by Descartes and to this day it still considers humans as beings composed of distinct entities combined into a certain form. Because of this observation, one began to believe that the focus of a health treatment could be exclusively on the affected area of the body, without the need to pay attention to patient’s subjectivity.

    By seeing pain as a merely sensory response, this model was not capable of encompassing chronic pain, since the latter is a complex process that can occur independently of tissue damage. As of the second half of the twentieth century, when it became impossible to deny the relationship between psyche and soma, the current understanding of chronic pain emerges: that of chronic pain as an individual experience, the result of a sum of biological, psychological, and social factors that, for this reason, cannot be approached separately from the individual who expresses pain.

    This understanding has allowed a significant improvement in perspective, emphasizing the characteristic of pain as an individual experience. However, the understanding of chronic pain as a sum of factors corresponds to the current way of seeing the process of falling ill, for its conception holds a Cartesian duality and the positivist premise of a single reality. For phenomenology, on the other hand, the individual in their unity is more than the sum of parts. Phenomenology sees a human being as an intending entity, in which body, mind, and the world are intertwined and constitute each other mutually. Therefore, a real understanding of the chronic pain process would only be possible from a phenomenological point of view at the experience lived by the individual who expresses and communicates pain.

    (Adapted from Dantas-Lima et al. The phenomenological-existential comprehension of chronic pain: going beyond the standing healthcare models. 2014.)

    23. Which of the following can be reasonably inferred from the passage?
  • 0
    0

    Explanation

    The correct answer is B.

    In this question, you will notice by scanning the statements that they all relate to the time at which certain concepts came to light. Therefore, when you look for the subject of the sentence as the keyword your task is to see when they came to light, if the text gives a timeframe at all.

    Statement A has the keyword ‘compartmentally’, which is addressed in the second sentence. This view, according to the text, dates back to Ancient Greece so is not a relatively new idea.

    Statement B has the key phrase ‘psyche and soma’, which is found late in the first paragraph. The relationship between these aspects of a human, according to the text, became apparent ‘as of the second half of the twentieth century’, which is relatively recently.

    Statement C has the key phrase ‘Cartesian duality’, which is seen in the second paragraph. This is used as a criticism of sorts of our current perception of chronic pain, and the time of its conception of a concept is not addressed at all.

    Statement D has the keyword phenomenology, the subject of the conclusion of this passage. Once again, the time of origin of phenomenology as a system is not addressed.

    Post Comment

    A distinguishing characteristic of the biomedical model is its compartmentalized view of man. This way of seeing human beings has its origin in Ancient Greek thought; it was stated by Descartes and to this day it still considers humans as beings composed of distinct entities combined into a certain form. Because of this observation, one began to believe that the focus of a health treatment could be exclusively on the affected area of the body, without the need to pay attention to patient’s subjectivity.

    By seeing pain as a merely sensory response, this model was not capable of encompassing chronic pain, since the latter is a complex process that can occur independently of tissue damage. As of the second half of the twentieth century, when it became impossible to deny the relationship between psyche and soma, the current understanding of chronic pain emerges: that of chronic pain as an individual experience, the result of a sum of biological, psychological, and social factors that, for this reason, cannot be approached separately from the individual who expresses pain.

    This understanding has allowed a significant improvement in perspective, emphasizing the characteristic of pain as an individual experience. However, the understanding of chronic pain as a sum of factors corresponds to the current way of seeing the process of falling ill, for its conception holds a Cartesian duality and the positivist premise of a single reality. For phenomenology, on the other hand, the individual in their unity is more than the sum of parts. Phenomenology sees a human being as an intending entity, in which body, mind, and the world are intertwined and constitute each other mutually. Therefore, a real understanding of the chronic pain process would only be possible from a phenomenological point of view at the experience lived by the individual who expresses and communicates pain.

    (Adapted from Dantas-Lima et al. The phenomenological-existential comprehension of chronic pain: going beyond the standing healthcare models. 2014.)

    24. Which of the following is true, according to the passage?
  • 0
    0

    Explanation

    The correct answer is C.

    For this question, none of the statements are extreme and the keywords are relatively similar in quality. However, reading the first couple of sentences reveals that A is unlikely to be true because it says that the biomedical model sees man compartmentally, therefore this is not the phenomenological view. Start with B and work through.

    Statement A, as discussed, is made unlikely by the first couple of sentences. It does not explicitly say here that the biomedical model is not phenomenological, but from the previous question you may remember that phenomenology is presented in the passage as a contrasting view to the accepted model. Therefore, it is a relatively safe assumption that you can skip A to save time.

    Statement B has the keyword ‘tissue damage’, which is found in the middle of the first paragraph. Here, the text says that chronic pain ‘can occur independently’ of tissue damage.

    Statement C has the key phrase ‘biological and non-biological’, which is found at the end of the first paragraph. The beginning of the second paragraph describes this concept of pain as beneficial, therefore this statement is true.

    Statement D, similarly to statement A, is shown by the last couple of sentences compared to the first couple. The article starts by presenting the current view, or the biomedical model, and contrasting it later with the phenomenological idea. Therefore, chronic pain is not currently considered phenomenologically. 

    Post Comment

    “Doc, I know the test is positive, but how sure are you that it means I have the disease?”. This is one of the most common questions asked by patients after receiving troubling test results, and to address it you must understand the concepts of specificity and sensitivity.

    Sensitivity measures how often a test correctly generates a positive result for people who have the condition that’s being tested for (also known as the “true positive” rate). A test that’s highly sensitive will flag almost everyone who has the disease and not generate many false-negative results. For example: a test with 90% sensitivity will correctly return a positive result for 90% of people who have the disease but will return a negative result — a false-negative — for 10% of the people who have the disease and should have tested positive.

    Specificity measures a test’s ability to correctly generate a negative result for people who don’t have the condition that’s being tested for (also known as the “true negative” rate). A high-specificity test will correctly rule out almost everyone who doesn’t have the disease and won’t generate many false-positive results. For example: a test with 90% specificity will correctly return a negative result for 90% of people who don’t have the disease, but will return a positive result — a false-positive — for 10% of the people who don’t have the disease and should have tested negative.

    (Adapted from https://www.healthnewsreview.org/toolkit/tips-for-understanding-studies/understanding-medical-tests-sensitivity-specificity-and-positive-predictive-value/)

    25. Which of the following statements can be inferred from the passage?
  • 0
    0

    Explanation

    The correct answer is C.

    In this question, the numbers may look confusing but it can ultimately be answered by scanning the text for a simplistic definition of both specificity and sensitivity, then assessing the statements one by one.

    Sensitivity is defined in the passage as ‘the true positive rate’. Specificity is defined as ‘the true negative rate’. With this in mind, you can assess the statements carefully.

    Statement A says that a test with 80% specificity will give false negatives 80% of the time, but we know that specificity is the true negative rate, so it will actually give true negatives 80% of the time.

    Statement B says that a test with high specificity and low sensitivity is useless. This could be discounted because it is extreme and too far, but from our definitions we can assume that knowing someone does not have the disease is important.

    Statement C says that a 70% sensitive test will give false-negatives 30% of the time. This may require a quick look back at the text to see where ‘false negative’ is mentioned to see that the remaining % of a sensitive test is false negatives, therefore this statement is true.

    Statement D is the same concept as statement C, what happens the rest of the time on a specific test? Actually, for a 40% specific test, the other 60% will be false positives, according to the text.

    Post Comment

    “Doc, I know the test is positive, but how sure are you that it means I have the disease?”. This is one of the most common questions asked by patients after receiving troubling test results, and to address it you must understand the concepts of specificity and sensitivity.

    Sensitivity measures how often a test correctly generates a positive result for people who have the condition that’s being tested for (also known as the “true positive” rate). A test that’s highly sensitive will flag almost everyone who has the disease and not generate many false-negative results. For example: a test with 90% sensitivity will correctly return a positive result for 90% of people who have the disease but will return a negative result — a false-negative — for 10% of the people who have the disease and should have tested positive.

    Specificity measures a test’s ability to correctly generate a negative result for people who don’t have the condition that’s being tested for (also known as the “true negative” rate). A high-specificity test will correctly rule out almost everyone who doesn’t have the disease and won’t generate many false-positive results. For example: a test with 90% specificity will correctly return a negative result for 90% of people who don’t have the disease, but will return a positive result — a false-positive — for 10% of the people who don’t have the disease and should have tested negative.

    (Adapted from https://www.healthnewsreview.org/toolkit/tips-for-understanding-studies/understanding-medical-tests-sensitivity-specificity-and-positive-predictive-value/)

    26. Which of the following statements is true, according to the passage?
  • 0
    0

    Explanation

    The correct answer is D.

    In this question, you can assess the statements with common sense from the definitions of sensitivity and specificity, or you can assess the statements individually by keyword.

    Statement A has the keyword specificity, addressed at the very beginning of the third paragraph. Actually, specificity measure how often a negative result is correct.

    Statement B has the keyword ‘samples’, which cannot be found in the text. Therefore, this statement cannot be discerned from the text.

    Statement C has the keyword ‘importance’, which again is not addressed. The two aspects are simply explained in the text, without discussion of their relative merits.

    Statement D has the keyword ‘specific’, which is again addressed in the third paragraph. This is described as the ability to correctly generate a negative response – therefore a negative result on a specific test is likely to mean one does not have the disease.

    Post Comment

    Robert Burns’s father had come to Ayrshire from Kincardineshire in an endeavour to improve his fortunes, but, though he worked immensely hard first on the farm of Mount Oliphant, which he leased in 1766, and then on that of Lochlea, which he took in 1777, ill luck dogged him, and he died in 1784, worn out and bankrupt. It was watching his father being thus beaten down that helped to make Robert both a rebel against the social order of his day and a bitter satirist of all forms of religious and political thought that condoned or perpetuated inhumanity.

    He acquired a superficial reading knowledge of French and a bare smattering of Latin, and he read most of the important 18th-century English writers as well as Shakespeare, Milton, and Dryden. His knowledge of Scottish literature was confined in his childhood to orally transmitted folk songs and folk tales together with a modernization of the late 15th-century poem “Wallace.” His religion throughout his adult life seems to have been a humanitarian Deism.

    Proud, restless, and full of a nameless ambition, the young Burns did his share of hard work on the farm. His father’s death made him tenant of the farm of Mossgiel to which the family moved and freed him to seek male and female companionship where he would. He had an affair with a servant girl at the farm, Elizabeth Paton, who in 1785 bore his first child, and on the child’s birth he welcomed it with a lively poem.

    (Adapted from https://www.britannica.com/biography/Robert-Burns#:~:text=Burns’s%20father%20had%20come%20to,1784%2C%20worn%20out%20and%20bankrupt.)

    27. Which of the following statements is true of Robert Burns, according to the passage?
  • 0
    0

    Explanation

    The correct answer is C.

    This question is deceptive – it is not a true type 1 question because the whole passage is about Robert Burns. All the statements have good keywords, so it is best to quickly work through them from A to D.

    Statement A has the keyword ‘French’, which is found in the first paragraph. It says here that Burns had a ‘superficial reading knowledge’ of French, not a proficient speaking knowledge.

    Statement B has the keyword ‘Wallace’, which is described as a 15th century poem; Burns was born in the 18th so cannot have written it.

    Statement C has the keyword ‘religious’, and at the end of the second paragraph it says Burns’ religion was ‘humanitarian Deism’, so he was religious.

    Statement D has the keyword Paton, found at the end of the second paragraph where it says Burns had his first child out of an affair with a farm worker, not his wife.

    Post Comment

    Robert Burns’s father had come to Ayrshire from Kincardineshire in an endeavour to improve his fortunes, but, though he worked immensely hard first on the farm of Mount Oliphant, which he leased in 1766, and then on that of Lochlea, which he took in 1777, ill luck dogged him, and he died in 1784, worn out and bankrupt. It was watching his father being thus beaten down that helped to make Robert both a rebel against the social order of his day and a bitter satirist of all forms of religious and political thought that condoned or perpetuated inhumanity.

    He acquired a superficial reading knowledge of French and a bare smattering of Latin, and he read most of the important 18th-century English writers as well as Shakespeare, Milton, and Dryden. His knowledge of Scottish literature was confined in his childhood to orally transmitted folk songs and folk tales together with a modernization of the late 15th-century poem “Wallace.” His religion throughout his adult life seems to have been a humanitarian Deism.

    Proud, restless, and full of a nameless ambition, the young Burns did his share of hard work on the farm. His father’s death made him tenant of the farm of Mossgiel to which the family moved and freed him to seek male and female companionship where he would. He had an affair with a servant girl at the farm, Elizabeth Paton, who in 1785 bore his first child, and on the child’s birth he welcomed it with a lively poem.

    (Adapted from https://www.britannica.com/biography/Robert-Burns#:~:text=Burns’s%20father%20had%20come%20to,1784%2C%20worn%20out%20and%20bankrupt.)

    28. Which of the following can be reasonably inferred from the passage?
  • 0
    0

    Explanation

    The correct answer is B.

    Here, statements C and D have the best keywords so you may wish to start by assessing these.

    Statement A has the key phrase ‘beaten down’, which is found in the first paragraph. It says here that the events of his father’s life ‘helped to make him (a satirist)’. We cannot assume from this that he would not have become a satirist without these events.

    Statement B has the keyword ‘religion’, which is found in the same part of the text describing Burns as a satirist. It says that he was a ‘bitter satirist (against some parts of religion)’. Therefore, it is a reasonable inference that he disagreed with some aspects of it.

    Statement C has the keyword ‘Latin’, found in the same section of text talking about French. He did understand basic Latin, but the text does not say how he learned this.

    Statement D has the keyword Milton, which is found in the first paragraph. This confirms that Burns read Milton, but not that he was inspired by him per se.

    Post Comment

    At the end of March, video chat app Houseparty, owned by Epic Games, responded to unsubstantiated reports that user accounts had been hacked – by offering a $1m bounty to anyone able to prove the rumours were part of a coordinated campaign to smear the company.

    The developer said at the time it had no evidence of any link between Houseparty and claimed compromises of accounts at other services like Spotify, Netflix, and PayPal. And it insisted Houseparty accounts were secure. While some tweets taking aim at Houseparty appear to be dubious, evidence of any smear campaign has yet to surface, and it appears the $1m bounty has not been awarded. The Register twice asked Houseparty to confirm this. Though we received a statement, no answer was provided to that particular question.

    Nor was any bug bounty paid to security researcher Zach Edwards after he found that Houseparty’s domain infrastructure had been hijacked and abused to distribute malicious content. On March 31, Edwards, co-founder of web analytics biz Victory Medium, criticized the chat app maker via Twitter for the lack of Content Security Policy headers on a password reset page. He suspected there may be further security issues, and a week later he submitted a bug report detailing over a dozen subdomains of the app that were serving malicious PDFs.

    Edwards said: “The facts are clear that an organized hacker and credit card fraud network used Epic Games subdomains to launch attacks on users, and this group continues to orchestrate these attacks across the internet and has for years.” He refers to the hacking group as the Pickaflick.com Crew and plans to publish further details on Wednesday.

    (Adapted from The Register, https://www.theregister.com/2020/05/20/houseparty_subdomain_hijack/)

    29. Which of the following is true?
  • 0
    0

    Explanation

    The correct answer is C.

    Here, Statement A is an extreme statement so can be tried last. Statement C has good keywords, with a number and and acronym together so this may be a good place to start.

    Statement A uses extreme language – the phrase ‘entirely’. It is unlikely to be true, and PayPal is a good keyword. On searching for it, you would find that the developer claims there is no link. Therefore, it is unclear and as such we cannot assume this statement is true.

    Statement B is at first glance true however the reason is incorrect which makes the statement invalid. In fact, the first paragraph mentions the reward is for anyone who can provide proof of a concerted smear campaign, not just a hack.

    Statement C is quite straightforward – PDF is an excellent keyword as an abbreviation. However, if you were to choose 12 as your keyword (also a good choice as a number), then you would have to remember to search for synonyms such as ‘a dozen’ or just go back and use the other option, PDF.

    Statement D uses the name of the newspaper, which may not normally be a good keyword but in this case, because the article is about Houseparty, it works quite well. This is a passage adjustment, because the text states the The Register twice asked Houseparty to confirm a statement but does not mention how many questions were asked.

    Top tip!

    In this case, Statement C has the best keywords and is the best answer! You can save a lot of time by carefully selecting which statement to examine first.

    Post Comment

    At the end of March, video chat app Houseparty, owned by Epic Games, responded to unsubstantiated reports that user accounts had been hacked – by offering a $1m bounty to anyone able to prove the rumours were part of a coordinated campaign to smear the company.

    The developer said at the time it had no evidence of any link between Houseparty and claimed compromises of accounts at other services like Spotify, Netflix, and PayPal. And it insisted Houseparty accounts were secure. While some tweets taking aim at Houseparty appear to be dubious, evidence of any smear campaign has yet to surface, and it appears the $1m bounty has not been awarded. The Register twice asked Houseparty to confirm this. Though we received a statement, no answer was provided to that particular question.

    Nor was any bug bounty paid to security researcher Zach Edwards after he found that Houseparty’s domain infrastructure had been hijacked and abused to distribute malicious content. On March 31, Edwards, co-founder of web analytics biz Victory Medium, criticized the chat app maker via Twitter for the lack of Content Security Policy headers on a password reset page. He suspected there may be further security issues, and a week later he submitted a bug report detailing over a dozen subdomains of the app that were serving malicious PDFs.

    Edwards said: “The facts are clear that an organized hacker and credit card fraud network used Epic Games subdomains to launch attacks on users, and this group continues to orchestrate these attacks across the internet and has for years.” He refers to the hacking group as the Pickaflick.com Crew and plans to publish further details on Wednesday.

    (Adapted from The Register, https://www.theregister.com/2020/05/20/houseparty_subdomain_hijack/)

    30. Which of the following statements can be inferred about the $1 million bounty?
  • 0
    0

    Explanation

    The correct answer is C.

    This is a type 1 statement question, which is focussed on the 1 million bounty. Orient yourself in the text wherever this is mentioned, then try to pick out key phrases from each statement to begin. Remember this is a positive question, which of the statements can be inferred about the bounty so you are looking to eliminate false statements.

    Statement A has the keyword ‘awarded’ and ‘security researcher’. This is mentioned in the text saying that Edwards (a security researcher) was not awarded the bounty. Moreover, the text says ‘there is no evidence’ the bounty has been awarded at all, so this cannot be the answer.

    Statement B requires an inference. There are no particularly useful keywords except bounty, so ensure you have found everywhere this comes up in the text. In the third paragraph, it is mentioned that The Register asked twice about it and received a statement, but no direct answer to their question. It is therefore a safe inference that Houseparty have not been very open and transparent.

    Statement C requires your knowledge from the initial readthrough of the first couple of sentences and for you to find the section on what Zach Edwards has done. Remember that synthesising information from different techniques may be important in the exam. In the first paragraph, we see that the award was offered for anyone providing proof of a smear campaign. However, Edwards only provided proof of a hack. Therefore, he strictly did not meet the criteria for the bounty so Statement C is the correct answer.

    Statement D is a direct mismatch with the passage, which says that the reward was for anyone who could provide the requested proof.

    Post Comment

    The French artist JR is a magician who conjures people onto walls. His method is simple: he travels in his photo-booth truck, taking people’s portraits, which he pastes onto the sides of buildings. The effect is astounding, sublime. JR has sent a seventy-five-foot-tall ballerina soaring over Tribeca in her tutu, and inscribed the wrinkled faces of two dozen elderly Cubans onto the flaking, cracked walls of Havana. Raffi Khatchadourian noted in his Profile of the artist that JR is often drawn to places whose residents’ humanity and individuality are habitually ignored or subsumed in political rhetoric: Tunisia, Iran, Palestine, the favelas of Rio de Janeiro. The work is temporary by design; most of the walls on which he pastes his images will long outlast them, just as they will outlast the people who live within and walk by. The point is to bear witness, to mark the spot of a life.

    Last week, JR installed a new work in the Mexican city of Tecate, an hour southeast of San Diego: a monumental photograph of Kikito, a smiling toddler, pasted onto a special scaffolding placed just behind the border fence with California. Seen from the American side, the child seems to be peering over the slatted fence as if from inside a crib, getting ready to crawl toward something that’s caught his interest. JR announced the work, last Wednesday, by posting a picture to his Instagram account of a million followers, showing two uniformed Border Patrol officers looking up at the image of Kikito as the installation was taking place. He has since updated his Instagram profile to include a Google Maps pin to the work’s exact location, so that people can visit it.

    (Adapted from The New Yorker, https://www.newyorker.com/news/as-told-to/the-artist-jr-lifts-a-mexican-child-over-the-border-wall)

    31. Which of the following is true?
  • 0
    0

    Explanation

    The correct answer is D.

    This is a type 2 statement question, remember to be vigilant in searching for key words from more likely statements, or those with easy to identify keywords. Kikito is quite general as you can see from a skim-read that the second paragraph is to do with this piece. The best keywords can be found in question 4, which has a company name (Instagram) in it, so it is good to start here. In fact, if you do, you would identify this as the true statement immediately and be able to move on!

    Statement A is difficult because although socio-economically would be a good key-phrase, it is not mentioned in the text. However, any mention of places and their status is good to scan for and you would see that JR is drawn to places in which political rhetoric subsumes individuality and identity. The quotes areas are not socio-economically privileged, so this statement is false.

    Statement B has the key phrases ‘border fence’ or ‘installed’. Remember that it’s ok to start with either of these, and if you struggle to find synonyms or the phrase itself to try the other, assume the answer is can’t tell, or keep searching. In fact, the text says the picture is pasted onto a special scaffold just behind the fence, so this statement is false.

    Statement C has the key phrases ‘temporary’ and anything to do with architecture. It is true that JR’s work is temporary, but not for the reason stated in the question. In fact, the text states that it is temporary because the buildings will outlive it, and this is part of the point.

    Statement D is the correct answer. Of all the statements, Instagram is an easy and recognisable keyword to go for and it is seen in the last paragraph which explains JR has pinned the location on Instagram.

    Top tip!
    Statement C is incorrect because it cites the wrong reason. It is important to not reflexively see that something is true and select it, if there is a reason always verify!

    Post Comment

    The French artist JR is a magician who conjures people onto walls. His method is simple: he travels in his photo-booth truck, taking people’s portraits, which he pastes onto the sides of buildings. The effect is astounding, sublime. JR has sent a seventy-five-foot-tall ballerina soaring over Tribeca in her tutu, and inscribed the wrinkled faces of two dozen elderly Cubans onto the flaking, cracked walls of Havana. Raffi Khatchadourian noted in his Profile of the artist that JR is often drawn to places whose residents’ humanity and individuality are habitually ignored or subsumed in political rhetoric: Tunisia, Iran, Palestine, the favelas of Rio de Janeiro. The work is temporary by design; most of the walls on which he pastes his images will long outlast them, just as they will outlast the people who live within and walk by. The point is to bear witness, to mark the spot of a life.

    Last week, JR installed a new work in the Mexican city of Tecate, an hour southeast of San Diego: a monumental photograph of Kikito, a smiling toddler, pasted onto a special scaffolding placed just behind the border fence with California. Seen from the American side, the child seems to be peering over the slatted fence as if from inside a crib, getting ready to crawl toward something that’s caught his interest. JR announced the work, last Wednesday, by posting a picture to his Instagram account of a million followers, showing two uniformed Border Patrol officers looking up at the image of Kikito as the installation was taking place. He has since updated his Instagram profile to include a Google Maps pin to the work’s exact location, so that people can visit it.

    (Adapted from The New Yorker, https://www.newyorker.com/news/as-told-to/the-artist-jr-lifts-a-mexican-child-over-the-border-wall)

    32. Which of the following can be inferred regarding Kikito?
  • 0
    1

    Explanation

    The correct answer is B.

    This is a type 2 statement question, where all the answers will be focussed on Kikito which is discussed in the second paragraph. Focus your search for keywords here after reading the first couple of lines.

    Statement A has the keyword border fence, which will draw you to the second paragraph. Here, it says that Kikito appears to be ‘peering over the slatted fence’, implying the picture is taller than the fence. This is therefore the correct answer

    Statement B has the useful keyword Wednesday. You can see in the text that JR announced the piece with a picture of its installation on a Wednesday, but it is a stretch to infer that this is when the picture was erected.

    Statement C has the keywords Border Police but remember to look for synonyms in the text! In this case the police are referred to as officers, and the text simply says that they were watching without mentioning their opinions. Even though you might assume that such a politically motivated piece would not be welcome, you cannot assume this from the text alone. It is not the correct answer.

    Statement D has the keyword curious, for which a good synonym is ‘interest’ which is found in the text saying that it is ‘as if’ something has caught his interest. In fact, we cannot infer what the child in the picture was thinking so this answer is not correct.

    Post Comment
    Heidi Medicmind Tutor

    Thu, 05 Aug 2021 22:57:06

    The explanation states A is the correct answer.

    sage Medicmind Tutor

    Mon, 30 Aug 2021 03:23:33

    so the answer is actually a and not b? (b is shown by the green highlight not a)

    A recent study suggested that schoolteachers in North America could be contributing to the invasive species problem by releasing the live animals they use as teaching tools. “As many as 1,000 different non-native organisms used in the classroom are being released into the wild by school-teachers,” Oregon State’s Sam Chan said. As such, the study is being used by some as an argument against the use of animals in the classroom. To me, the release of a handful of classroom animals won’t have any major repercussions on the local ecosystem. Rather, I think, this supposed environmental concern is merely a scare story driven by people who oppose vivisection. But there is no doubt that this is in itself useful for teaching.

    What are we talking about here? “Oregon teachers who have ordered crayfish that originate in the Pacific Northwest have found that their mortality is extremely high, so many have taken to ordering crayfish from distributors who get their supply from Louisiana,” Chan explained in the release. “The problem is that we have no idea whether those crayfish may carry diseases or parasites that may be problematic if those animals are released into the wild here.”

    It may of course be true that Louisiana crayfish carry disease, but how many animals are actually released into the wild by this particular route? Chan is pretty vague about the numerical extent of this grave problem. What about the thousands of live animals indiscriminately thrown away by restaurants, fish markets and lobster pounds, who find they have a surplus of animals and decide to dispose of them into the environment? These animals may also carry disease, and outnumber those animals released from the classroom by several orders of magnitude.

    (Adapted from a piece by Richard J Naftalin in The Scientist, https://www.the-scientist.com/opinion/opinion-keep-animals-in-the-classroom-39972)

    33. Which of the following statements can be inferred from the text?
  • 0
    0

    Explanation

    The correct answer is A.

    This is a simple type 2 statement question, so remember to read the first couple of sentences then eliminate any unlikely statements before working from the best keywords you can find. In this case, none of the statements use extremes, so you can work off the best keywords. Statements 1 and 2 have the word ‘Louisiana’, so you may be able to kill two birds with one stone by searching first for this keyword.

    Statement A draws you to the end of the second paragraph, in which Sam Chan says that we do not know how many have diseases. Therefore, this statement is true.

    Statement B is a partly numerical question which can also be found in paragraph 2. Although Chan states that more schoolteachers are now ordering from Louisiana, there are no statistics to base this statement on so it cannot be inferred from the text.

    Statement C has two keywords, Sam Chan and vivisection. Although the author states a suspicion that opponents of vivisection are using the study, nowhere in the text does it mention Chan’s views on the practice. Therefore, the statement is a stretch to infer.

    Statement D is a valid statement from the passage with incorrect reasoning which cannot be inferred. On searching for the keyword ‘restaurant’, you will see that restaurants dispose of animals when they have a surplus, not when the animals are diseased.

    Post Comment

    The 2019 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine goes to William Kaelin , Peter Ratcliffe and Gregg Semenza “for their discoveries of how cells sense and adapt to oxygen availability,” the Nobel Assembly at the Karolinska Institute announced today (October 7).

    In 1995, Semenza’s lab was the first to identify the genes that encode hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1), a transcription factor that alters cellular responses to low oxygen. His group found that HIF-1 responds to low oxygen levels by controlling which genes are used in a cell. The protein enables cancer cells to live in the low-oxygen conditions found within tumours, and helps the body respond to cardiovascular events that limit oxygen flow to parts of the body.

    Kaelin and Ratcliffe then uncovered the cellular mechanisms behind the regulation of HIF-1. Kaelin’s 1999 study of the tumour-suppressor gene VHL, which helps control HIF, has been crucial for understanding cellular responses to changes in oxygen levels, according to a Harvard Medical School press release. Mutations in VHL cause von Hippel–Lindau disease, a disorder that results in cysts and benign tumours. Following the discovery of VHL’s link to HIF, Kaelin and Ratcliffe independently published papers in Science in 2001 on how the VHL protein recognizes and binds to HIF.

    “It’s fantastic research that they’ve done,” Eamonn Maher tells The Scientist. “It’s great that the research on a very rare disorder such as von Hippel–Lindau disease was instrumental in providing the insights into something as fundamental as oxygen sensing . . . the observations that they’ve made are wonderful,” he says.

    (Adapted from The Scientist. https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/cells-oxygen-sensing-discovery-earns-nobel-prize-66538)

    Top tip for scientific articles!
    These types of passages tend to have excellent keywords with a lot of acronyms and keywords, focus on these particularly.

    34. Which of the following statements can be inferred from the text?
  • 0
    0

    Explanation

    The correct answer is D.

    This is a type 2 statement question with a nonspecific stem. Spend a little more time reading the first part of the text to understand the passage, then eliminate any statements which are less likely to be true and start with good keywords. In this question, Statement C is quite extreme saying that Maher had nothing to do with the research, so you can probably skip this one.

    Statement A has the key date 1999 and phrase Harvard Medical School. This is a slight adaptation of the text which states that Harvard said the 1999 work on VHL was critical but does not say when Harvard said this. Therefore, we cannot tell if the statement is true and it is not the answer.

    Statement B is another one to be careful on, because 3 names are mentioned in the text. The main focus of the statement is Semenza, so this is the best thing to search for. You will see that Semenza’s 1995 work identified HIF-1a, with no mention of the other names. Therefore, this cannot be inferred.

    Statement C is an extreme statement, and when you search for Maher’s name you will see no mention of their work. Therefore, it cannot be inferred and is not the answer.

    Statement D is the correct answer here. The keyword ‘rare’ is a good one to search for, which is found when Maher refers to rare disorders. The whole statement says, in short, that study of Hippel-Lindau disease led to the discovery of a fundamental process, which is a very broad implication. Therefore, this is the correct answer.

    Keyword tip!
    Articles which mention several names will often have questions on the role of each person. This is fertile ground for passage alterations which are there to trip you up, make sure you read carefully what each person has done when using their name as a keyword to avoid this.

    Post Comment

    Much research on human behaviour and psychology assumes that everyone shares most fundamental cognitive and affective processes, and that findings are generalisable. A growing body of evidence suggests that this is not the case.

    Experimental findings from several disciplines indicate considerable variation among human populations in diverse domains, such as visual perception, analytic reasoning, fairness, cooperation, memory and the heritability of IQ. This is in line with what anthropologists have long suggested: that people from Western, educated, industrialized, rich and democratic (WEIRD) societies are some of the most psychologically unusual people on Earth.

    So, the fact that the vast majority of studies use WEIRD participants presents a challenge to the understanding of human psychology and behaviour. A 2008 survey of the top psychology journals found that 96% of subjects were from Western industrialized countries — which house just 12% of the world’s population. Strange, then, that research articles routinely assume that their results are broadly representative, rarely adding even a cautionary footnote on how far their findings can be generalized.

    We offer four suggestions to help put theories of human behaviour and psychology on a firmer empirical footing. First, editors and reviewers should push researchers to support any generalizations with evidence. Second, granting agencies, reviewers and editors should give researchers credit for comparing diverse and inconvenient subject pools. Third, granting agencies should prioritize cross-disciplinary, cross-cultural research. Fourth, researchers must strive to evaluate how their findings apply to other populations. There are several low-cost ways to approach this in the short term: one is to select a few judiciously chosen populations that provide a ‘tough test’ of universality in some domain, such as societies with limited counting systems for testing theories about numerical cognition.

    (Adapted from Nature. https://www.nature.com/articles/466029a)

    35. Which of the following statements can be inferred from the passage?
  • 0
    0

    Explanation

    The correct answer is D.

    This is a type 2 statement question with a nonspecific stem. Spend a little more time reading the first part of the text to understand the passage, then eliminate any statements which are less likely to be true and start with good keywords. Statement A has the best key word of 12%, whereas Statement C is an extreme statement so if pushed for time you could skip this. Remember that extreme statements are not always incorrect, just that it is fair to skip them if pressed for time!

    Statement A has the key phrase 12%, which can be found in the text when it says WEIRD populations comprise 12% of the population. However, WEIRD comprises Western, educated, industrialised, rich and democratic societies therefore it is unlikely that 12% of the population live in democratic societies.

    Statement B is relatively extreme and lacks good keywords, so you could skip this if struggling for time. In this situation, you are best off using WEIRD and reading only sentences that refer to this, and you would find that research suggests these societies are not representative. However, that is not to say that they are not worth researching, so this statement cannot be inferred.

    Statement C is an extreme statement, and has the keyword representative, which can be found in the third paragraph where it states that authors ‘routinely’ assume their results are representative, not always therefore this statement cannot be inferred.

    Post Comment

    Ever since it was announced last February that Harper Lee was to publish a sequel to her famed and much-loved To Kill a Mockingbird, fans reacted with a mixture of delight, confusion and no little anxiety. The concern was not simply about what would become in the “new” work of the celebrated lawyer Atticus Finch and his beloved daughter, Scout, but about the circumstances in which the famously reclusive Ms Lee had been persuaded to publish a work written more than 50 years earlier and apparently consigned to a cobwebbed drawer.

    Indeed, such was the furore created when lawyer Tonja Carter claimed she had discovered the manuscript in the summer of 2014 while doing some work for Lee, that health department officials in Alabama were obliged to carry out an inquiry into whether the elderly writer, living in an assisted-living facility in the town of Monroeville since 2007, was unfairly forced or manipulated into publishing a second novel. They concluded she had not been. But some scholars and people who knew her in Monroeville remained suspicious about the circumstances of the book’s publication. Lee, who had a stroke in 2007, had trouble seeing and was largely deaf.

    Karen Hare, the owner of David’s Catfish House on the edge of Monroeville, told the newspaper that Lee had commented several times during her visits that were she ever to publish another book, she would want it done posthumously.

    (Adapted from The Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/harper-lee-the-controversy-that-still-surrounds-authors-lost-novel-a6884671.html)

    36. Which of the following is true, according to the passage?
  • 0
    0

    Explanation

    The correct answer is B.

    This is a type 2 statement question, remember to read the first section of text then skim to get an idea what it’s about! Then, use the Medic Mind shortcuts to find the best statement to start with. Statement C has an extreme phrase, ‘everyone’, whereas the others have quite good keyphrases so you could start with any.

    Statement A is a causation statement – asserting that the cause of Harper Lee’s deafness is her 2007 stroke. 2007 is a good keyword, which will lead you to the text mentioning that Lee had a stroke and was hard of hearing. However, the text does not explicitly state that this stroke was the reason for the deafness, therefore we cannot infer it and it is ‘cannot tell’, which in this style of question is not true.

    Statement B has the keywords ‘lawyer’ and ‘manuscript’. The passage says in the first paragraph that Tonja Carter, a lawyer, discovered the manuscript so this is a direct match and the correct answer.

    Statement C uses an extreme, that everyone was happy. From your initial read, you would see in the first paragraph that some fans reacted with anxiety therefore we can assume that not everyone was completely happy.

    Statement D has the excellent key-phrase David’s Catfish House. If you were short on time, you would be forgiven for assuming this was correct given the name of the establishment. However, in the text we see that the owner was a female, Karen Hare.

    Common trap
    Correlation/causation questions are a great way to trip students up. Statement A here makes an assertion which is not supported by the text which simply says Lee had a stroke and was hard of hearing. If the text had said ‘Lee had a stroke in 2007, which left her largely deaf’, the assertion would be supportable but this is not the case.

    Post Comment

    J. D. Salinger, at one time thought to be the most important American writer to emerge since World War II but who then turned his back on success and adulation, famous for not wanting to be famous, died on Wednesday at his home in Cornish, N.H., where he had lived reclusively for more than 50 years. He was 91.

    Though not everyone, teachers and librarians especially, was sure what to make of it, his work “Catcher in the Rye” became an almost immediate best seller, and its narrator and main character, Holden Caulfield, a teenager newly expelled from prep school, became America’s best-known literary truant since Huckleberry Finn.

    With its cynical, vernacular voice, its sympathetic understanding of adolescence and its fierce if alienated sense of morality and distrust of the adult world, the novel struck a nerve in cold war America and quickly attained cult status, especially among the young. Reading “Catcher” used to be an essential rite of passage.

    The novel’s allure persists to this day, even if some of Holden’s preoccupations now seem a bit dated, and it continues to sell more than 250,000 copies a year. Mark David Chapman, who killed John Lennon in 1980, even said the explanation for his act could be found in the pages of “The Catcher in the Rye.” In 1974 Philip Roth wrote, “The response of college students to the work of J. D. Salinger indicates that he, more than anyone else, has not turned his back on the times but, instead, has managed to put his finger on whatever struggle of significance is going on today between self and culture.”

    (Adapted from The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/29/books/29salinger.html)

    37. Which of the following statements can be inferred from the text?
  • 0
    0

    Explanation

    The correct answer is C.

    This is a type 2 statement question, so make sure you spend a little extra time reading the first part of the text to familiarise yourself. Remember to start with the 3 Medic Mind Shortcuts to decide which statement to assess first. Here, statements 1 and 3 have easy-to-identify keywords, whereas 2 uses extreme language. You could start with Statement A and, if short on time, skip Statement B.

    Statement A has the keyword Cornish, NH which you can find in the first paragraph. It mentions that Salinger died aged 91 but lived here for more than 50 years which is more than half his life. This statement is incorrect.

    Statement B uses extreme language and could be skipped because this is a type 2 question if you were short on time. A good keyword may be ‘observations’ or ‘relatable’, but it is difficult to find these. A difficult but valid synonym here is ‘preoccupations’, which is found in the final paragraph which says some of these seem a little dated, so this statement is incorrect.

    Statement C has a date which is a very good keyword. You will find that in 1974, Roth said that college students respond very well to the book, so it is a fair inference that at this time it was a very prevalent book in colleges. This is the correct answer.

    Statement D has the name Holden Caulfield, but on scanning for this name you will see that this is the main character of the book which forms a large part of the passage. In this case, it works because the first mention of Caulfield is that he was expelled from a prep school, not a high school so the answer is incorrect. However, in other passages you may not be so lucky and should be ready to come back and select a better keyword with the passage subject in mind!

    Top tip
    Extreme statements are often not true, simply by virtue of what they are. It will always be harder to infer an extreme statement from a text, because there is only one way for a text to tell you something in an absolute manner (eg: ALL the observations strike a chord today) whereas there might be more than one way to make a softer inference, such as some of the observations strike a chord. However, it is important to remember that this is not always the case, and some extreme statements may be true. Thus, you save time by skipping them with caution, but don’t count them out completely.

    Post Comment

    J. D. Salinger, at one time thought to be the most important American writer to emerge since World War II but who then turned his back on success and adulation, famous for not wanting to be famous, died on Wednesday at his home in Cornish, N.H., where he had lived reclusively for more than 50 years. He was 91.

    Though not everyone, teachers and librarians especially, was sure what to make of it, his work “Catcher in the Rye” became an almost immediate best seller, and its narrator and main character, Holden Caulfield, a teenager newly expelled from prep school, became America’s best-known literary truant since Huckleberry Finn.

    With its cynical, vernacular voice, its sympathetic understanding of adolescence and its fierce if alienated sense of morality and distrust of the adult world, the novel struck a nerve in cold war America and quickly attained cult status, especially among the young. Reading “Catcher” used to be an essential rite of passage.

    The novel’s allure persists to this day, even if some of Holden’s preoccupations now seem a bit dated, and it continues to sell more than 250,000 copies a year. Mark David Chapman, who killed John Lennon in 1980, even said the explanation for his act could be found in the pages of “The Catcher in the Rye.” In 1974 Philip Roth wrote, “The response of college students to the work of J. D. Salinger indicates that he, more than anyone else, has not turned his back on the times but, instead, has managed to put his finger on whatever struggle of significance is going on today between self and culture.”

    (Adapted from The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/29/books/29salinger.html)

    38. Which of the following can be inferred about JD Salinger?
  • 0
    0

    Explanation

    The correct answer is C.

    This at first may seem to be a type 1 question which has a keyword in the title. However, when you do your initial read of the article, you will see it is about JD Salinger so this is more of a type 2 question, where the keyword is not overly helpful. Therefore, prepare as for a type 2 question by reading carefully the first section and start with the statements with the best keywords.

    Statement A has the place Cornish, which is a good keyword and is found in the first paragraph. Although the passage says he lived ‘reclusively’, that does not mean that no one lived with him. Therefore, it is a stretch to infer that he lived alone, and this is not the correct answer.

    Statement B requires you to scan for any words related to the keyword ‘youth’. You will see that Catcher gained popularity ‘among the young’, and was ‘sympathetic’ to adolescence, but there is not mention of for whom the book was written. Therefore, this is not a fair inference.

    Statement C has the keyword ‘slang’, for which a synonym is ‘vernacular’ which is found in the third paragraph mentioning the book’s cynical, vernacular tone. This is therefore a direct match with the passage, and the correct answer.

    Statement D has the acronym WW2, which is a good keyword. Remember though to always search for the keyword and the expanded acronym, in this case World War II. In the first paragraph, it says that he was ‘at one time’ thought of as the most important American author since WW2, but not that he was. This is therefore not a fair inference.

    Post Comment

    With surfing coming to the Olympics in 2020, and the Olympics heading to Paris in 2024, French organizers had to look elsewhere to hold a world-class surf competition in the summer months. They found a spot. The drawback? It’s almost 10,000 miles away: Teahupo’o, Tahiti, home to one of the most iconic and dangerous waves in the world. Just how dangerous? Teahupo’o roughly translates to “wall of skulls.”

    Tahiti, which is part of French Polynesia, beat out four other possible locations for the competition: Biarritz, Lacanau, Les Landes, and La Torche. All of those are in France, where the rest of the Olympics is taking place. Organizers of the 2024 Games confirmed the decision this week, and it will be the first time since the women’s championship tour in 2000 that both men and women will compete at Teahupo’o.

    Surfers that come through the barrel of a powerful wave, like those at Teahupo’o, can experience one of the greatest highs, and high scores, of their lives. But one wrong move and they could quickly find themselves in serious danger of banging into the sharp corral reef that looms just below the water’s surface.

    Keala Kennelly is deeply familiar with that concept. A professional surfer from Hawaii, Kennelly has been called the Queen of Teahupo’o, and she is considered one of the hardest charging athletes to surf the wave. In 2011, she needed 40 stitches in her face and skull after enduring a wipe-out there. When she returned two years later, she said, she caught what she called one of the best barrels of her life.

    (Adapted from The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/06/sports/olympics/surfing-olympics-teahupoo-tahiti.html)

    39. Which of the following is true, according to the passage?
  • 0
    0

    Explanation

    The correct answer is C.

    This is a type 2 statement question with a non-specific stem. Read the first part of the passage carefully, then use the Medic Mind Shortcuts to identify the best statements to start with. Here, statements A and B have the best keywords so start here.

    Statement A has the useful key-phrase ‘wall of skulls’, which can be found in the third paragraph. However, on reading around this paragraph states that the name ‘roughly’ translates this way, not directly. Therefore, this statement is untrue.

    Statement B requires some lateral thinking. We are told in the passage that the 2024 Olympic Surfing events will be held in Teahupo’o, but we also see that ‘surfing is coming to the Olympics in 2020’, so it will not in fact debut in Teahupo’o.

    Statement C has the keyword ‘2000’, which can be found in the fourth paragraph which states directly that the women’s championship tour was held in Teahupo’o in 2000. This is a direct match with the passage, so true.

    Statement D has the keyword ‘safe’. In this case, synonyms and antonyms may be useful – if you find reference to danger at Teahupo’o for elite level surfers you can negate the statement. In this case, we see that Keala Kennelly, a professional surfer, was severely injured in Teahupo’o so it is not safe even for elite surfers who must take care.

    Post Comment
    Heidi Medicmind Tutor

    Thu, 05 Aug 2021 23:02:32

    Isn't C the correct answer, as explained?

    Australia’s first people—known as Aboriginal Australians—have lived on the continent for over 50,000 years. Today, there are 250 distinct language groups spread throughout Australia. Aboriginal Australians are split into two groups: Aboriginal peoples, who are related to those who already inhabited Australia when Britain began colonizing the island in 1788, and Torres Strait Islander peoples, who descend from residents of the Torres Strait Islands, a group of islands that is part of modern-day Queensland, Australia.

    All Aboriginal Australians are related to groups indigenous to Australia. However, the use of the term indigenous is controversial, since it can be claimed by people who descend from people who weren’t the original inhabitants of the island. Legally, “Aboriginal Australian” is recognized as “a person of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander descent who identifies as an Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander and is accepted as such by the community in which he [or she] lives.”

    Today, about three percent of Australia’s population has Aboriginal heritage. Aboriginal Australians still struggle to retain their ancient culture and fight for recognition—and restitution—from the Australian government. The state of Victoria is currently working toward a first-of-its-kind treaty with its Aboriginal population that would recognize Aboriginal Australians’ sovereignty and include compensation. However, Australia itself has never made such a treaty, making it the only country in the British Commonwealth not to have ratified a treaty with its First Nations peoples.

    (Adapted from National Geographic, https://www.nationalgeographic.co.uk/2019/02/aboriginal-australians)

    40. Which of the following is true according to the passage?
  • 0
    0

    Explanation

    The correct answer is B.

    This is a type 2 question with a non-specific stem, so take time to read the first section of the passage before using the Medic Mind Shortcuts to choose good statements to start with. Here, statement D is extreme whereas statements A and B have numbers which make good keywords.

    Statement A has the key phrase 250. Remember to look for both the number and the word! In the text in the first paragraph it is mentioned that there are 250 language groups, but not more so this is not true according to the passage.

    Statement B has the key phrase 97%. Scanning for this won’t find anything, but if you broaden your search to any percentages you will see 3% in the third paragraph. Here, it says that 3% of Australians have Aboriginal heritage so it follows that about 97% don’t, and this is true according to the passage.

    Statement C has the key phrase ‘ancient culture’, which can be found in the third paragraph which says Aboriginal Australians are ‘struggling’ to retain their ancient culture, so it is not in fact easy for them and this statement is false.

    Post Comment

    Cystic fibrosis (CF) causes passageways in the lungs and digestive system to become blocked with thick, sticky secretions, causing irreversible fatal lung damage. The average life expectancy is about 47 years for half of those born with cystic fibrosis. But a price deal between the US drug manufacturer, Vertex, and the NHS means that about 5,000 adults and children such as me can look forward to a longer life. One drug, Orkambi, increases a patient’s lung function by up to 20%.

    A few months before the deal, my consultant told me I had the correct CF mutations to take Orkambi which has been made available. At the time, access to these medications carried the unaffordable price tag of £100,000 per patient per year, so my doctor warned me that it could be a long wait.

    But will Britain’s proposed exit from the EU hinder access to these medications? Vertex has assured me that: “When the UK leaves the European Union, all eligible patients across the UK will continue to have access to Vertex licensed CF medicines, as contractually agreed.” 

    Yet recent reports suggest that a post-Brexit US-UK trade deal could see US drug companies drive up the costs of the drugs they currently sell to the NHS. Considering how hard we had to fight to get these medications, it is terrifying to know that if political circumstances change, our lives may once again hang in the balance. These decisions are in the hands of people unaffected by this debilitating illness, who will not value Orkambi in the same way those with CF do. We have to hope that the fight for our lives wasn’t in vain.

    (Adapted from The Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/nov/20/cystic-fibrosis-orkambi-brexit-trade-deal)

    41. Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?
  • 0
    0

    Explanation

    The correct answer is A.

    This is a type 2 statement question in which you need to remember to familiarise yourself with the passage before using the Medic Mind shortcuts to choose the best keywords. In this case, it would be reasonable to start at A because mutation is a good keyword. However, statements B and C have easier keywords which are numbers so could be assessed quickly. You could start with any of these statements.

    Statement A has the keyword ‘mutation’, which can be found in the text in the first paragraph which says the consultant told the author they had the ‘correct mutations’. We can infer from this statement that there is more than one mutation causing cystic fibrosis, so this is the correct answer.

    Statement B has the keyword ‘47’, which can be found in the first paragraph where it is explained that the life expectancy for about half of CF patients is 47. However, this does not mean that half of the patients will live to 47, therefore we cannot say that half will live past this point. This is not the correct answer.

    Statement C has the keyword ‘£300,000’, however you would need to think a little laterally and look for other prices or ballpark figures to work this out. In the text, it says that the price was £100,000 for one patient for 1 year. Therefore, two patients for three years would be £600,000, not £300,000.

    Statement D is difficult because the keywords ‘quality’ and ‘length’ are quite non-specific. However, you see in the first paragraph the statement ‘can look forward to a longer life’ if you search for words such as ‘long’ or ‘longer’. Therefore, this statement is not true and Orkambi can improve length of life.

    Post Comment

    Every weekend in countries around the world, grown men and women don elaborate costumes, adopt assumed identities, and meet up to enact fantastical scenes set in alternate realities. Although many still consider it a fringe activity, Live Action Role Playing ( LARP) has exploded in popularity over the past decade, with chapters springing up from Minneapolis to Moscow.

    German photographer Boris Leist has spent the past four years documenting some of the world’s most dedicated LARPers. He first learned about the activity while shooting a Renaissance Fair in Norway, where he met a man dressed as a Tolkien-esque dwarf, complete with body armour and weapons. The man was an IT professional by day but was so dedicated to LARPing that he had enrolled in an evening welding class to learn how to make his armor.

    “I was very impressed by how high-quality his costume was,” Leist remembers. “I told myself, I have to learn more about this”
    Leist began attending LARP events around Germany, where the activity is particularly popular. Many of the LARPers were wary of him at first, having been burned before by journalists only interested in mocking them. Leist eventually earned their trust by himself dressing up as a mendicant monk named Boris the Reader, with a full backstory.

    Although LARPers are sometimes mocked as people who refuse to grow up, Leist respects their artistry and devotion to their craft. “They’re really creating a whole world,” he said. “I like that these are people creating things in their free time, and not for money. They’re living out their creativity.”

    (Adapted from Wired, https://www.wired.com/story/photo-gallery-larping/)

    42. Which of the following statements can be inferred from the article?
  • 0
    0

    Explanation

    The correct answer is D.

    This is a type 2 statement question, so remember to orient yourself with the passage by reading the first couple of sentences, then use the Medic Mind shortcuts to find the best question to start with. In this case, statements B and C have the best keywords so you could start here and come back to A if you were unsure.

    Statement A has the loose keyword ‘fringe’ and the better one ‘Germany’. In the text, Germany is mentioned in the fourth paragraph where it says LARP is particularly popular. However, it does not say how popular and earlier in the article it states that LARP is a fringe activity gaining in popularity. Therefore, we do not have enough information about LARP in Germany to answer this.

    Statement B has the keyword ‘welding’, which is mentioned in the second paragraph where it mentions a man who enrolled in welding classes to make his costume. However, it is not stated whether this is a requirement for all LARP costumes, so this is not the answer.

    Statement C has the useful key-phrase Boris the Reader, which is found in the fourth paragraph. Here, it states that his character is a monk, not a knight. This slight passage adjustment could be enough to trip you up under time pressure, so always make sure to carefully compare the statement and the passage!

    Statement D has the keyword ’10 years’, for which a synonym is ‘decade’. In the first paragraph, the passage says that popularity has increased in the last decade therefore it is more popular than 10 years ago.

    Post Comment

    The cod wars were a series of disputes between Britain and Iceland running from the 1950s to the 1970s over the rights to fish in Icelandic waters. Although it was never a war in the conventional sense of the word (the massive and well-equipped Royal Navy would have easily defeated the tiny Icelandic Navy), the peak of the Cod Wars saw thirty-seven Royal Navy warships mobilised to protect British trawlers fishing in the disputed territory. While the wars were eventually settled through diplomatic means there was conflict between British naval vessels and Icelandic ships out at sea. The Cod Wars showed how seriously nations took their fishing rights.

    The first Cod War took place in autumn 1958 and was caused by a dispute over who could fish in the seas surrounding Iceland. In the late 1950s a country’s Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) – the area of sea that a country controlled and could fish in exclusively – only extended four miles out to sea from a country’s coastline. British trawlers could therefore fish very close to Iceland. Iceland – worried that foreign vessels were overexploiting their fisheries – brought in a new law that extended their EEZ to twelve miles. Britain was not happy and chose to ignore this new limit and continued to fish up to the original four-mile limit. The situation escalated when Britain sent warships to protect its trawlers fishing in the disputed areas.

    A number of incidents took place including Icelandic patrol boats firing across the bows of British trawlers in an effort to force them to leave the new zone, and Britain threatening to sink any Icelandic vessels that attacked British trawlers. Eventually, Britain accepted that it had no right to stop Iceland extending the EEZ to twelve miles and backed down.

    (Adapted from https://britishseafishing.co.uk/the-cod-wars/)

    43. Which of the following statements can be reasonably inferred from the passage?
  • 0
    0

    Explanation

    The correct answer is A.

    Here, statements B and C have the best keywords whereas statement D is an extreme statement.

    Statement A has the key phrase ‘more than one’, which can be quite easily deduced from the first sentence of both paragraphs. In the first paragraph, the passage says ‘the cod wars’, which implies more than one. Moreover, the second paragraph discusses ‘the first Cod War’, which once again implies more than one.

    Statement B has the key phrase ‘fired shots’, which can be found in the second paragraph where it says Icelandic ships fired shots across the bows of British ships. However, no mention is made of who fired the first shots therefore we cannot deduce it was Britain who shot first.

    Statement C has the keyword EEZ, which is found in the second paragraph a few times. The second mention says that Iceland expanded their EEZ ‘worried that foreign vessels were overexploiting their fisheries’, therefore it was not British aggression as much as exploitation.

    Statement D has the keyword ‘warships’, and although the text says the peak saw 37 warships deployed, we do not know the events of any cod wars beyond the first.

    Post Comment

    The cod wars were a series of disputes between Britain and Iceland running from the 1950s to the 1970s over the rights to fish in Icelandic waters. Although it was never a war in the conventional sense of the word (the massive and well-equipped Royal Navy would have easily defeated the tiny Icelandic Navy), the peak of the Cod Wars saw thirty-seven Royal Navy warships mobilised to protect British trawlers fishing in the disputed territory. While the wars were eventually settled through diplomatic means there was conflict between British naval vessels and Icelandic ships out at sea. The Cod Wars showed how seriously nations took their fishing rights.

    The first Cod War took place in autumn 1958 and was caused by a dispute over who could fish in the seas surrounding Iceland. In the late 1950s a country’s Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) – the area of sea that a country controlled and could fish in exclusively – only extended four miles out to sea from a country’s coastline. British trawlers could therefore fish very close to Iceland. Iceland – worried that foreign vessels were overexploiting their fisheries – brought in a new law that extended their EEZ to twelve miles. Britain was not happy and chose to ignore this new limit and continued to fish up to the original four-mile limit. The situation escalated when Britain sent warships to protect its trawlers fishing in the disputed areas.

    A number of incidents took place including Icelandic patrol boats firing across the bows of British trawlers in an effort to force them to leave the new zone, and Britain threatening to sink any Icelandic vessels that attacked British trawlers. Eventually, Britain accepted that it had no right to stop Iceland extending the EEZ to twelve miles and backed down.

    (Adapted from https://britishseafishing.co.uk/the-cod-wars/)

    44. Which of the following statements is true, according to the passage?
  • 0
    0

    Explanation

    The correct answer is B.

    For this question, statement C has the best keyword which is a date. Therefore, you may want to start here before proceeding.

    Statement A has the keyword ‘resolved’, which is synonymous with ‘settled’. This is found in the first paragraph which says the wars were ‘eventually settled through diplomatic means’, not military ones.

    Statement B has the key phrase ‘sink’, which is found in the first paragraph where the text explains Britain threatened to ‘sink any vessels that attacked British travellers’. Therefore, this statement is true.

    Statement C has the keyword ‘1959’, which is not found in the text. Rather, according to the passage, the first Cod War occurred in 1958.

    Statement D has the key phrase ‘end the war’, and at the end of the passage the text says that England ‘accepted it had no right… and backed down’. Therefore, it was actually England that ceded this first war.

    Post Comment

    Type 2 General Review Screen

    Instructions

    Below is a summary of your answers. You can review your questions in three (3) different ways.

    The buttons in the lower right-hand corner correspond to these choices:

    1. Review all of your questions and answers.
    2. Review questions that are incomplete.
    3. Review questions that are flagged for review. (Click the 'flag' icon to change the flag for review status.)

    You may also click on a question number to link directly to its location in the exam.

    Type 2 General Section

    Final Answer Review Screen

    Instructions

    This review section allows you to view the answers you made and see whether they were correct or not. Each question accessed from this screen has an 'Explain Answer' button in the top left hand side. By clicking on this you will obtain an explanation as to the correct answer.

    At the bottom of this screen you can choose to 'Review All' answers, 'Review Incorrect' answers or 'Review Flagged' answers. Alternatively you can go to specific questions by opening up any of the sub-tests below.

    Type 2 General Section

    x

    +/-
    %
    MRC
    M-
    M+
    7
    8
    9
    4
    5
    6
    1
    2
    3
    ON/C
    0
    .
    ÷
    ×
    -
    +
    =